Parameter Selection and Pre-Conditioning for a Graph Form Solver

In a recent paper, Parikh and Boyd describe a method for solving a convex optimization problem, where each iteration involves evaluating a proximal operator and projection onto a subspace. In this paper we address the critical practical issues of how to select the proximal parameter in each iteration, and how to scale the original problem variables, so as the achieve reliable practical performance. The resulting method has been implemented as an open-source software package called POGS (Proximal Graph Solver), that targets multi-core and GPU-based systems, and has been tested on a wide variety of practical problems. Numerical results show that POGS can solve very large problems (with, say, more than a billion coefficients in the data), to modest accuracy in a few tens of seconds. As just one example, a radiation treatment planning problem with around 100 million coefficients in the data can be solved in a few seconds, as compared to around one hour with an interior-point method.Comment: 28 pages, 1 figure, 1 open source implementatio

Optimization Methods for Inverse Problems

Optimization plays an important role in solving many inverse problems. Indeed, the task of inversion often either involves or is fully cast as a solution of an optimization problem. In this light, the mere non-linear, non-convex, and large-scale nature of many of these inversions gives rise to some very challenging optimization problems. The inverse problem community has long been developing various techniques for solving such optimization tasks. However, other, seemingly disjoint communities, such as that of machine learning, have developed, almost in parallel, interesting alternative methods which might have stayed under the radar of the inverse problem community. In this survey, we aim to change that. In doing so, we first discuss current state-of-the-art optimization methods widely used in inverse problems. We then survey recent related advances in addressing similar challenges in problems faced by the machine learning community, and discuss their potential advantages for solving inverse problems. By highlighting the similarities among the optimization challenges faced by the inverse problem and the machine learning communities, we hope that this survey can serve as a bridge in bringing together these two communities and encourage cross fertilization of ideas.Comment: 13 page