1,037 research outputs found
LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 251, ITCS 2023, Complete Volum
The Diophantine problem in Chevalley groups
In this paper we study the Diophantine problem in Chevalley groups , where is an indecomposable root system of rank , is
an arbitrary commutative ring with . We establish a variant of double
centralizer theorem for elementary unipotents . This theorem is
valid for arbitrary commutative rings with . The result is principle to show
that any one-parametric subgroup , , is Diophantine
in . Then we prove that the Diophantine problem in is
polynomial time equivalent (more precisely, Karp equivalent) to the Diophantine
problem in . This fact gives rise to a number of model-theoretic corollaries
for specific types of rings.Comment: 44 page
Bounded Relativization
Relativization is one of the most fundamental concepts in complexity theory, which explains the difficulty of resolving major open problems. In this paper, we propose a weaker notion of relativization called bounded relativization. For a complexity class ?, we say that a statement is ?-relativizing if the statement holds relative to every oracle ? ? ?. It is easy to see that every result that relativizes also ?-relativizes for every complexity class ?. On the other hand, we observe that many non-relativizing results, such as IP = PSPACE, are in fact PSPACE-relativizing.
First, we use the idea of bounded relativization to obtain new lower bound results, including the following nearly maximum circuit lower bound: for every constant ? > 0, BPE^{MCSP}/2^{?n} ? SIZE[2?/n].
We prove this by PSPACE-relativizing the recent pseudodeterministic pseudorandom generator by Lu, Oliveira, and Santhanam (STOC 2021).
Next, we study the limitations of PSPACE-relativizing proof techniques, and show that a seemingly minor improvement over the known results using PSPACE-relativizing techniques would imply a breakthrough separation NP ? L. For example:
- Impagliazzo and Wigderson (JCSS 2001) proved that if EXP ? BPP, then BPP admits infinitely-often subexponential-time heuristic derandomization. We show that their result is PSPACE-relativizing, and that improving it to worst-case derandomization using PSPACE-relativizing techniques implies NP ? L.
- Oliveira and Santhanam (STOC 2017) recently proved that every dense subset in P admits an infinitely-often subexponential-time pseudodeterministic construction, which we observe is PSPACE-relativizing. Improving this to almost-everywhere (pseudodeterministic) or (infinitely-often) deterministic constructions by PSPACE-relativizing techniques implies NP ? L.
- Santhanam (SICOMP 2009) proved that pr-MA does not have fixed polynomial-size circuits. This lower bound can be shown PSPACE-relativizing, and we show that improving it to an almost-everywhere lower bound using PSPACE-relativizing techniques implies NP ? L.
In fact, we show that if we can use PSPACE-relativizing techniques to obtain the above-mentioned improvements, then PSPACE ? EXPH. We obtain our barrier results by constructing suitable oracles computable in EXPH relative to which these improvements are impossible
An Infinite Needle in a Finite Haystack: Finding Infinite Counter-Models in Deductive Verification
First-order logic, and quantifiers in particular, are widely used in
deductive verification. Quantifiers are essential for describing systems with
unbounded domains, but prove difficult for automated solvers. Significant
effort has been dedicated to finding quantifier instantiations that establish
unsatisfiability, thus ensuring validity of a system's verification conditions.
However, in many cases the formulas are satisfiable: this is often the case in
intermediate steps of the verification process. For such cases, existing tools
are limited to finding finite models as counterexamples. Yet, some quantified
formulas are satisfiable but only have infinite models. Such infinite
counter-models are especially typical when first-order logic is used to
approximate inductive definitions such as linked lists or the natural numbers.
The inability of solvers to find infinite models makes them diverge in these
cases. In this paper, we tackle the problem of finding such infinite models.
These models allow the user to identify and fix bugs in the modeling of the
system and its properties. Our approach consists of three parts. First, we
introduce symbolic structures as a way to represent certain infinite models.
Second, we describe an effective model finding procedure that symbolically
explores a given family of symbolic structures. Finally, we identify a new
decidable fragment of first-order logic that extends and subsumes the
many-sorted variant of EPR, where satisfiable formulas always have a model
representable by a symbolic structure within a known family. We evaluate our
approach on examples from the domains of distributed consensus protocols and of
heap-manipulating programs. Our implementation quickly finds infinite
counter-models that demonstrate the source of verification failures in a simple
way, while SMT solvers and theorem provers such as Z3, cvc5, and Vampire
diverge
Aspects Topologiques des Représentations en Analyse Calculable
Computable analysis provides a formalization of algorithmic computations over infinite mathematical objects. The central notion of this theory is the symbolic representation of objects, which determines the computation power of the machine, and has a direct impact on the difficulty to solve any given problem. The friction between the discrete nature of computations and the continuous nature of mathematical objects is captured by topology, which expresses the idea of finite approximations of infinite objects.We thoroughly study the multiple interactions between computations and topology, analysing the information that can be algorithmically extracted from a representation. In particular, we focus on the comparison between two representations of a single family of objects, on the precise relationship between algorithmic and topological complexity of problems, and on the relationship between finite and infinite representations.L’analyse calculable permet de formaliser le traitement algorithmique d’objets mathématiques infinis. La théorie repose sur une représentation symbolique des objets, dont le choix détermine les capacités de calcul de la machine, notamment sa difficulté à résoudre chaque problème donné. La friction entre le caractère discret du calcul et la nature continue des objets est capturée par la topologie, qui exprime l’idée d’approximation finie d’objets infinis.Nous étudions en profondeur les multiples interactions entre calcul et topologie, cherchant à analyser l’information qui peut être extraite algorithmiquement d’une représentation. Je me penche plus particulièrement sur la comparaison entre deux représentations d’une même famille d’objets, sur les liens détaillés entre complexité algorithmique et topologique des problèmes, ainsi que sur les relations entre représentations finies et infinies
Ideal presentations and numberings of some classes of effective quasi-Polish spaces
The well known ideal presentations of countably based domains were recently
extended to (effective) quasi-Polish spaces. Continuing these investigations,
we explore some classes of effective quasi-Polish spaces. In particular, we
prove an effective version of the domain-characterization of quasi-Polish
spaces, describe effective extensions of quasi-Polish topologies, discover
natural numberings of classes of effective quasi-Polish spaces, estimate the
complexity of the (effective) homeomorphism relation and of some classes of
spaces w.r.t. these numberings, and investigate degree spectra of continuous
domains
- …