Mining document, concept, and term associations for effective biomedical retrieval - Introducing MeSH-enhanced retrieval models

Manually assigned subject terms, such as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in the health domain, describe the concepts or topics of a document. Existing information retrieval models do not take full advantage of such information. In this paper, we propose two MeSH-enhanced (ME) retrieval models that integrate the concept layer (i.e. MeSH) into the language modeling framework to improve retrieval performance. The new models quantify associations between documents and their assigned concepts to construct conceptual representations for the documents, and mine associations between concepts and terms to construct generative concept models. The two ME models reconstruct two essential estimation processes of the relevance model (Lavrenko and Croft 2001) by incorporating the document-concept and the concept-term associations. More specifically, in Model 1, language models of the pseudo-feedback documents are enriched by their assigned concepts. In Model 2, concepts that are related to users’ queries are first identified, and then used to reweight the pseudo-feedback documents according to the document-concept associations. Experiments carried out on two standard test collections show that the ME models outperformed the query likelihood model, the relevance model (RM3), and an earlier ME model. A detailed case analysis provides insight into how and why the new models improve/worsen retrieval performance. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed. This study provides new ways to formally incorporate semantic annotations, such as subject terms, into retrieval models. The findings of this study suggest that integrating the concept layer into retrieval models can further improve the performance over the current state-of-the-art models.Ye

Exploiting user signals and stochastic models to improve information retrieval systems and evaluation

The leitmotiv throughout this thesis is represented by IR evaluation. We discuss different issues related to effectiveness measures and novel solutions that we propose to address these challenges. We start by providing a formal definition of utility-oriented measurement of retrieval effectiveness, based on the representational theory of measurement. The proposed theoretical framework contributes to a better understanding of the problem complexities, separating those due to the inherent problems in comparing systems, from those due to the expected numerical properties of measures. We then propose AWARE, a probabilistic framework for dealing with the noise and inconsistencies introduced when relevance labels are gathered with multiple crowd assessors. By modeling relevance judgements and crowd assessors as sources of uncertainty, we directly combine the performance measures computed on the ground-truth generated by each crowd assessor, instead of adopting a classification technique to merge the labels at pool level. Finally, we investigate evaluation measures able to account for user signals. We propose a new user model based on Markov chains, that allows the user to scan the result list with many degrees of freedom. We exploit this Markovian model in order to inject user models into precision, defining a new family of evaluation measures, and we embed this model as objective function of an LtR algorithm to improve system performances