29,949 research outputs found
Deriving Verb Predicates By Clustering Verbs with Arguments
Hand-built verb clusters such as the widely used Levin classes (Levin, 1993)
have proved useful, but have limited coverage. Verb classes automatically
induced from corpus data such as those from VerbKB (Wijaya, 2016), on the other
hand, can give clusters with much larger coverage, and can be adapted to
specific corpora such as Twitter. We present a method for clustering the
outputs of VerbKB: verbs with their multiple argument types, e.g.
"marry(person, person)", "feel(person, emotion)." We make use of a novel
low-dimensional embedding of verbs and their arguments to produce high quality
clusters in which the same verb can be in different clusters depending on its
argument type. The resulting verb clusters do a better job than hand-built
clusters of predicting sarcasm, sentiment, and locus of control in tweets
On the Role of Text Preprocessing in Neural Network Architectures: An Evaluation Study on Text Categorization and Sentiment Analysis
Text preprocessing is often the first step in the pipeline of a Natural
Language Processing (NLP) system, with potential impact in its final
performance. Despite its importance, text preprocessing has not received much
attention in the deep learning literature. In this paper we investigate the
impact of simple text preprocessing decisions (particularly tokenizing,
lemmatizing, lowercasing and multiword grouping) on the performance of a
standard neural text classifier. We perform an extensive evaluation on standard
benchmarks from text categorization and sentiment analysis. While our
experiments show that a simple tokenization of input text is generally
adequate, they also highlight significant degrees of variability across
preprocessing techniques. This reveals the importance of paying attention to
this usually-overlooked step in the pipeline, particularly when comparing
different models. Finally, our evaluation provides insights into the best
preprocessing practices for training word embeddings.Comment: Blackbox EMNLP 2018. 7 page
Words are Malleable: Computing Semantic Shifts in Political and Media Discourse
Recently, researchers started to pay attention to the detection of temporal
shifts in the meaning of words. However, most (if not all) of these approaches
restricted their efforts to uncovering change over time, thus neglecting other
valuable dimensions such as social or political variability. We propose an
approach for detecting semantic shifts between different viewpoints--broadly
defined as a set of texts that share a specific metadata feature, which can be
a time-period, but also a social entity such as a political party. For each
viewpoint, we learn a semantic space in which each word is represented as a low
dimensional neural embedded vector. The challenge is to compare the meaning of
a word in one space to its meaning in another space and measure the size of the
semantic shifts. We compare the effectiveness of a measure based on optimal
transformations between the two spaces with a measure based on the similarity
of the neighbors of the word in the respective spaces. Our experiments
demonstrate that the combination of these two performs best. We show that the
semantic shifts not only occur over time, but also along different viewpoints
in a short period of time. For evaluation, we demonstrate how this approach
captures meaningful semantic shifts and can help improve other tasks such as
the contrastive viewpoint summarization and ideology detection (measured as
classification accuracy) in political texts. We also show that the two laws of
semantic change which were empirically shown to hold for temporal shifts also
hold for shifts across viewpoints. These laws state that frequent words are
less likely to shift meaning while words with many senses are more likely to do
so.Comment: In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International on Conference on
Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM2017
Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon
Even though considerable attention has been given to the polarity of words
(positive and negative) and the creation of large polarity lexicons, research
in emotion analysis has had to rely on limited and small emotion lexicons. In
this paper we show how the combined strength and wisdom of the crowds can be
used to generate a large, high-quality, word-emotion and word-polarity
association lexicon quickly and inexpensively. We enumerate the challenges in
emotion annotation in a crowdsourcing scenario and propose solutions to address
them. Most notably, in addition to questions about emotions associated with
terms, we show how the inclusion of a word choice question can discourage
malicious data entry, help identify instances where the annotator may not be
familiar with the target term (allowing us to reject such annotations), and
help obtain annotations at sense level (rather than at word level). We
conducted experiments on how to formulate the emotion-annotation questions, and
show that asking if a term is associated with an emotion leads to markedly
higher inter-annotator agreement than that obtained by asking if a term evokes
an emotion
- …