21 research outputs found

    Induced Saturation Number

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we discuss a generalization of the notion of saturation in graphs in order to deal with induced structures. In particular, we define indsat(n,H){\rm indsat}(n,H), which is the fewest number of gray edges in a trigraph so that no realization of that trigraph has an induced copy of HH, but changing any white or black edge to gray results in some realization that does have an induced copy of HH. We give some general and basic results and then prove that indsat(n,P4)=⌈(n+1)/3βŒ‰{\rm indsat}(n,P_4)=\lceil (n+1)/3\rceil for nβ‰₯4n\geq 4 where P4P_4 is the path on 4 vertices. We also show how induced saturation in this setting extends to a natural notion of saturation in the context of general Boolean formulas.Comment: 14 pages, 7 figure

    Removing induced powers of cycles from a graph via fewest edits

    Full text link
    What is the minimum proportion of edges which must be added to or removed from a graph of density pp to eliminate all induced cycles of length hh? The maximum of this quantity over all graphs of density pp is measured by the edit distance function, edForb(Ch)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_h)}(p), a function which provides a natural metric between graphs and hereditary properties. Martin determined edForb(Ch)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_h)}(p) for all p∈[0,1]p \in [0,1] when h∈{3,…,9}h \in \{3, \ldots, 9\} and determined edForb(C10)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_{10})}(p) for p∈[1/7,1]p \in [1/7, 1]. Peck determined edForb(Ch)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_h)}(p) for all p∈[0,1]p \in [0,1] for odd cycles, and for p∈[1/⌈h/3βŒ‰,1]p \in [ 1/\lceil h/3 \rceil, 1] for even cycles. In this paper, we fully determine the edit distance function for C10C_{10} and C12C_{12}. Furthermore, we improve on the result of Peck for even cycles, by determining edForb(Ch)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_h)}(p) for all p∈[p0,1/⌈h/3βŒ‰]p \in [p_0, 1/\lceil h/3 \rceil ], where p0≀c/h2p_0 \leq c/h^2 for a constant cc. More generally, if ChtC_h^t is the tt-th power of the cycle ChC_h, we determine edForb(Cht)(p)\text{ed}_{\text{Forb}(C_h^t)}(p) for all pβ‰₯p0p \geq p_0 in the case when (t+1)∣h(t+1) \mid h, thus improving on earlier work of Berikkyzy, Martin and Peck.Comment: 17 page
    corecore