3 research outputs found

    Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection

    Full text link
    The concept of dual hesitant fuzzy set arising from hesitant fuzzy set is generalized by including a function reflecting the decision maker’s fuzziness about the non-membership degree of the information provided. This paper studies some dual hesitant fuzzy information aggregation operators for aggregating dual hesitant fuzzy elements, such as dual hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean operator and dual hesitant fuzzy geometric Heronian mean operator. The research resulting dual hesitant fuzzy information aggregation operators finds an important role in group decision making (GDM) applications. It can fusion the experts’ opinion to the comprehensive ones and based on which an optimal decision making scheme can be determined. The properties of the proposed operators are studied and the application on GDM are investigated. The effectiveness of the GDM method is demonstrated on the case study about supplier selection

    Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of MADM approaches

    Get PDF
    In past years, the multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approaches have been extensively applied by researchers to the supplier evaluation and selection problem. Many of these studies were performed in an uncertain environment described by fuzzy sets. This study provides a review of applications of MADM approaches for evaluation and selection of suppliers in a fuzzy environment. To this aim, a total of 339 publications were examined, including papers in peer-reviewed journals and reputable conferences and also some book chapters over the period of 2001 to 2016. These publications were extracted from many online databases and classified in some categories and subcategories according to the MADM approaches, and then they were analysed based on the frequency of approaches, number of citations, year of publication, country of origin and publishing journals. The results of this study show that the AHP and TOPSIS methods are the most popular approaches. Moreover, China and Taiwan are the top countries in terms of number of publications and number of citations, respectively. The top three journals with highest number of publications were: Expert Systems with Applications, International Journal of Production Research and The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
    corecore