The Grizzly, February 7, 1995

Faculty and Administrators Focus on Sophomore Concerns • Survey of Ursinus Freshmen • Voice of Ursinus Rings Clear • Border Dispute Between Ecuador and Peru • Tabby Buckingham Dies at 16 • Ursinus Students Attend March for Life • Senior Spotlight: Michelle Ryan • WVOU: No Longer Speechless!! • The Marginal Uncertainty Hour Brings Talk Radio to Ursinus • Bears Snap Two-Game Skid • West Chester Edges Gymnasts • Cauley Triple Winner in Phone Meets • Cosgrove Sets Records in Win • Put Down the Pencils, Faculty is Going to Schoolhttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/1352/thumbnail.jp

When People are the Means: Negotiating with Respect

Most scholarship on negotiation ethics has focused on the topics of deception and disclosure. In this Article, I argue for considering a related, but distinct, ethical domain within negotiation ethics. That domain is the ethics of orientation. In contrast to most forms of human interaction, a clear purpose of negotiation is to get the other party to take an action on one\u27s behalf, or at least to explore that possibility. This gives rise to a core ethical tension in negotiation that I call the object-subject tension: how does one reconcile the fact that the other party is a potential means to one\u27s ends with general ethical requirements for treating people? In response, I argue that there is a general moral duty to respect other people, a duty that is not overridden by the fact of negotiation. I examine the nature of this duty and its implications for both direct principal-to-principal negotiations and legal negotiations conducted indirectly through lawyers

The Pacific Sentinel, November 2023

Editor: Eva Sheehan Articles in this issue include: Letter from the Editor Death Cab for Cutie Co-Headline with the Postal Service for a Twenty Year Anniversary Release When the Writers Come Out at Night Fall of the House of Usher A Professor\u27s Literary Life Donuts & Crypto Seeing Static in Jane Removers\u27 Census Designated What We\u27re Enjoying Events Calendar & Extrashttps://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/pacificsentinel/1047/thumbnail.jp

Chanticleer | Vol 50, Issue 24

https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/lib_ac_chanty/2334/thumbnail.jp

Extended control systems: A theory and its implications

Philosophers and cognitive scientists alike have recently been interested in whether cognition extends beyond the boundaries of skin and skull and into the environment. However, the extended cognition hypothesis has suffered many objections over the past few decades. In this paper, I explore the option of control extending beyond the human boundary. My aim is to convince the reader of three things: (i) that control can be implemented in artifacts, (ii) that humans and artifacts can form extended control systems, and (iii) that perhaps extended control ought to be preferred over extended cognition. Using the objections to extended cognition as constraints on my own extended theorizing and the example of autofocus systems in cameras, I decompose and localize the components of an autofocus system that realize the central properties of control from a plausible theory of control in the literature. I then provide criteria according to which control can be extended in a system. Finally, I consider how this theory of extended control ought to be preferred to theories of extended cognition