Self-Stabilizing Distributed Cooperative Reset

Self-stabilization is a versatile fault-tolerance approach that characterizes the ability of a system to eventually resume a correct behavior after any finite number of transient faults. In this paper, we propose a self-stabilizing reset algorithm working in anonymous networks. This algorithm resets the network in a distributed non-centralized manner, i.e., it is multi-initiator, as each process detecting an inconsistency may initiate a reset. It is also cooperative in the sense that it coordinates concurrent reset executions in order to gain efficiency. Our approach is general since our reset algorithm allows to build self-stabilizing solutions for various problems and settings. As a matter of facts, we show that it applies to both static and dynamic specifications since we propose efficient self-stabilizing reset-based algorithms for the (1-minimal) (f, g)-alliance (a generalization of the dominating set problem) in identified networks and the unison problem in anonymous networks. Notice that these two latter instantiations enhance the state of the art. Indeed, in the former case, our solution is more general than the previous ones, while in the latter case, the complexity of our unison algorithm is better than that of previous solutions of the literature

Tractable reliable communication in compromised networks

Reliable communication is a fundamental primitive in distributed systems prone to Byzantine (i.e. arbitrary, and possibly malicious) failures to guarantee the integrity, delivery, and authorship of the messages exchanged between processes. Its practical adoption strongly depends on the system assumptions. Several solutions have been proposed so far in the literature implementing such a primitive, but some lack in scalability and/or demand topological network conditions computationally hard to be verified. This thesis aims to investigate and address some of the open problems and challenges implementing such a communication primitive. Specifically, we analyze how a reliable communication primitive can be implemented in 1) a static distributed system where a subset of processes is compromised, 2) a dynamic distributed system where part of the processes is Byzantine faulty, and 3) a static distributed system where every process can be compromised and recover. We define several more efficient protocols and we characterize alternative network conditions guaranteeing their correctness