Zombies and Ghosts: Optimal Byzantine Agreement in the Presence of Omission Faults

Studying the feasibility of Byzantine Agreement (BA) in realistic fault models is an important question in the area of distributed computing and cryptography. In this work, we revisit the mixed fault model with Byzantine (malicious) faults and omission faults put forth by Hauser, Maurer, and Zikas (TCC 2009), who showed that BA (and MPC) is possible with $t$ Byzantine faults, $s$ send faults (whose outgoing messages may be dropped) and $r$ receive faults (whose incoming messages may be lost) if $n>3t+r+s$. We generalize their techniques and results by showing that BA is possible if $n>2t+r+s$, given the availability of a cryptographic setup. Our protocol is the first to match the recent lower bound of Eldefrawy, Loss, and Terner (ACNS 2022) for this setting

SoK: A Consensus Taxonomy in the Blockchain Era

Consensus (a.k.a. Byzantine agreement) is arguably one of the most fundamental problems in distributed systems, playing also an important role in the area of cryptographic protocols as the enabler of a (secure) broadcast functionality. While the problem has a long and rich history and has been analyzed from many different perspectives, recently, with the advent of blockchain protocols like Bitcoin, it has experienced renewed interest from a much wider community of researchers and has seen its application expand to various novel settings. One of the main issues in consensus research is the many different variants of the problem that exist as well as the various ways the problem behaves when different setup, computational assumptions and network models are considered. In this work we perform a systematization of knowledge in the landscape of consensus research starting with the original formulation in the early 1980s up to the present blockchain-based new class of consensus protocols. Our work is a roadmap for studying the consensus problem under its many guises, classifying the way it operates in many settings and highlighting the exciting new applications that have emerged in the blockchain era

Byzantine Agreement Decomposed: Honest Majority Asynchronous Total-Order Broadcast from Reliable Broadcast

It is well-known that Asynchronous Total Order Broadcast (ATOB) requires randomisation and that at most $t < n/3$ out of $n$ players are corrupted. This is opposed to synchronous total-order broadcast (STOB) which can tolerate $t < n/2$ corruptions and can be deterministic. We show that these requirements can be conceptually separated, by constructing an ATOB protocol which tolerates $t < n/2$ corruptions from blackbox use of Common Coin and Reliable Broadcast. We show the power of this conceptually simple contribution by reproving, using simpler protocols, existing results on STOB with optimistic responsiveness and asynchronous fallback. We also use the framework to prove the first ATOB with sub-quadratic communication and optimal corruption threshold $t < n/3$, new ATOBs with covert security and mixed adversary structures, and a new STOB with asymmetric synchrony assumptions

Notes on Theory of Distributed Systems

Notes for the Yale course CPSC 465/565 Theory of Distributed Systems