Emotional expressions reconsidered: challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require

Enabling Fairness in Cloud Computing Infrastructures

Cloud computing has emerged as a key technology in many ways over the past few years, evidenced by the fact that 93% of the organizations is either running applications or experimenting with Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud. Hence, to meet the demands of a large set of target audience, IaaS cloud service providers consolidate applications belonging to multiple tenants. However, consolidation of applications leads to performance interference with each other as these applications end up competing for the shared resources violating QoS of the executing tenants. This dissertation investigates the implications of interference in consolidated cloud computing environments to enable fairness in the execution of applications across tenants. In this context, this dissertation identifies three key issues in cloud computing infrastructures. We observe that tenants using IaaS public clouds share multi-core datacenter servers. In such a situation, we identify that the applications belonging to tenants might compete for shared architectural resources like Last Level Cache (LLC) and bandwidth to memory, slowing down the execution time of applications. This necessitates a need for a technique that can accurately estimate the slowdown in execution time caused due to multi-tenant execution. Such slowdown estimates can be used to bill tenants appropriately enabling fairness among tenants. For private datacenters, where performance degradation cannot be tolerated, it becomes critical to detect interference and investigate its root cause. Under such circumstances, there is a need for a real-time, lightweight and scalable mechanism that can detect performance degradation and identify the root cause resource which applications are contending for (I/O, network, CPU, Shared Cache). Finally, the advent of microservice computing environments, calls for a need to rethink resource management strategies in multi-tenant execution scenarios. Specifically, we observe that the visibility enabled by microservices execution framework can be exploited to achieve high throughput and resource utilization while still meeting Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in multi-tenant execution scenarios. To enable this, we propose techniques that can dynamically batch and reorder requests propagating through individual microservice stages within an application.PHDComputer Science & EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149844/1/ramsri_1.pd