163 research outputs found
RiistaelΓ€inten populaatioiden dynamiikka Pohjois-Euroopassa: tiivistelmΓ€ : 7. kansainvΓ€linen symposium. 24. β 28. Syyskuuta
We have studied Black Grouse population abundance and its dynamics in large regions of North-Europe and Uralsβ taiga (Finland, Russian Karelia, Murmansk, Arhangel, Kirov and Komi regions and). The data is based on Winter Track Counts (WTC, Priklonski, 1973), where all grouse sightings are recorded. We also studied the longterm Black Grouse abundance changes in Russian and Belarus Natural Reserves (by βChronical of Naturalβ Programme, including summer counts of forest grouses): Pinezhsky, Pechoro-Ilychskiy, National Park "Mechera", Nature Reserve "Kivach", "Bryansk Forest", Kostomuksha Nature Reserve Volzhsko-Kamsky National Nature Biosphere Reserve and Visimskiy State Nature Reserves. The highest and most stable abundances of Black Grouse were recorded from East Fennoscandia (Karelia β 3.6 birds per 10 km; Finland β 4.4, coefficient of variation β 12% and 27%, respectively), whereas in the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk Regions and Komi republic, e.g. the species abundance indices were 0.5, 2.5 and 1.1 birds per 10 km, respectively. The βPeakβ and minimal abundance years do not concur in different regions of north-European taiga. In Komi in the period from 2001 to 2013, the number of the black grouse declined twice, in Arhangel in the period 30 years β decreased fivefold. In Tatarstan Republic (Volzhsko-Kamsky National Nature Biosphere Reserve) after 1980 abundance decreased rapidly and at last 10 tears β disappeared. In Central Siberia BG are small in numbers and rare. The data suggest Black Grouse abundance varies significantly across Northern Eurasia and among years. One may presume there are some factors acting in different directions: towards convergence and towards divergence of the trends.Peer reviewe
Stone Age and Early Metal Period Archaeology and Settlement Patterns in the Lake PyhΓ€jΓ€rvi Micro-Region, Karelian Isthmus, Russia
Recent Finnish-Russian research cooperation on the Karelian Isthmus, north-west Russia, has completely changed views on the areaβs prehistory. In this paper we describe the methodology and results of archaeological field surveys and test excavations carried out in the so-called Lake PyhΓ€jΓ€rvi micro-region in 2005β2008. In the course of the projectβs field studies, the number of Stone Age and Early Metal Period sites in the area increased tenfold, and the exceptional, well-stratified settlement site of Kunnianniemi with nearly three-metredeep archaeological deposits was located. Recent studies provide reference material for the recently studied nearby areas and a working framework for further inquiries related to, for instance, the spatio-temporal changes in the settlement pattern, material culture, subsistence base, socio-cultural structure, and contact networks
ΠΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡ
VII ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ» ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ· Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ, Π€ΠΈΠ½Π»ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΡΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈ, Π‘Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 80 ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΌΠ°: ΠΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° Π°ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
; ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
; Π Π΅ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
, ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΉ
LateglacialβInterglacial transition: glaciotectonic, seismoactivity, catastrophic hydrographic and landscape changes
[ ΠΠΎΠ·Π΄Π½Π΅Π»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄: Π³Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΌΠΎΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅, Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π»Π°Π½Π΄ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ: ΠΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π¨ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
]. 25 Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ Β«LateglacialβInterglacial transition: glaciotectonic, seismoactivity, catastrophic hydrographic and landscape changes, South-Eastern FennoscandiaΒ», ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ° Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠΠ¦ Π ΠΠ.
Π ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 50 ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ· Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈ, ΠΠΈΡΠ²Ρ, ΠΠ°ΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ, Π€ΠΈΠ½Π»ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΠ°ΡΠΠ¦ Π ΠΠ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, Π³Π΅ΠΎΡ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ². Π£ΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ β ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ, ΡΠΎ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
, Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ². Π‘ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π²ΡΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°, Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»Π»ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ½Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ
Lithosphere 2021 : Eleventh symposium on structure, composition and evolution of the lithosphere
Programme and extended abstract
The Role of International Mechanisms in Promoting the Cultural Rights of National Minorities in a Changing Russian Federation (2000-2011)
The thesis analyses how, if at all, accession to international standards makes a difference to national minorities in Russia in the advancement of their cultural rights, focusing on the period 2000-2011. It further analyses the factors that influence particular forms of implementation of international standards. The study uses data from semi-structured interviews, as well as from legislation, legal judgements and Council of Europe documents. It focuses on three minorities as case studies: the Karelians, Mordovians and Tatars. The research is divided into three parts: 1) Practice and Law, investigating how the specific characteristics of the Russian domestic legal environment and of the relevant international standards generate a particular type of dynamics between the two; 2) Homogenisation, examining whether international standards can suspend or reverse Russiaβs culturally homogenising tendencies since the 2000s; 3) Exclusion, investigating to what extent, if at all, international standards may modify the dynamics of majority-minority relations by facilitating the introduction of a form of participation that is effective, in the area of decision- and policy-making on minoritiesβ cultural rights. The thesis concludes that the role of international standards in the area of minoritiesβ cultural rights is restricted in scope in Russia. Two sets of reasons are identified. First, specific features of Russian politics and society: (i) Russiaβs selective implementation of international law; (ii) the alternation of localism and centralism; (iii) Russiaβs homogenising centralisation and βmanaged diversityβ; (iv) the absence of guarantees for the upholding of minoritiesβ participatory rights, resulting in fictitious forms of participation. The second set of reasons relate to the complexities and weaknesses of international standards on minority rights themselves
Karelian Seaside in a Linguistic Context
The current state of the study of Russian dialects in Karelian Seaside is analyzed, the territory of the studied region, which coincides with the boundaries of the dialectal division of the Russian language in 1915 is indicated. It is shown that the exclusion of Karelian Seaside from the dialectal division of 1965, which was an indirect reason for the lack of proper research attention to this region is unjustified. An overview of linguistic works devoted to the study of various language levels (phonetic, grammatical, lexical) is presented. The review of dictionaries, including the vocabulary of Russian dialects of the Karelian Seaside, is carried out. The prospects and objectives of the study are determined. In particular, future research is associated with comparative work on the study of the preservation / change of linguistic phenomena at each level, including the lexical one, which is the most stable in its main core. It is primarily due to extralinguistic reasons. Particular attention is paid to the use of digital technologies when creating a textual database, tested on the materials of the Karelian Seaside. It is noted that the electronic resource will make it possible to constantly introduce new data into scientific circulation, connecting them to various aspects of research, both linguistic and broader humanitarian
- β¦