40,455 research outputs found

    Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexity

    Full text link
    In this work we analyze the sample complexity of classification by differentially private algorithms. Differential privacy is a strong and well-studied notion of privacy introduced by Dwork et al. (2006) that ensures that the output of an algorithm leaks little information about the data point provided by any of the participating individuals. Sample complexity of private PAC and agnostic learning was studied in a number of prior works starting with (Kasiviswanathan et al., 2008) but a number of basic questions still remain open, most notably whether learning with privacy requires more samples than learning without privacy. We show that the sample complexity of learning with (pure) differential privacy can be arbitrarily higher than the sample complexity of learning without the privacy constraint or the sample complexity of learning with approximate differential privacy. Our second contribution and the main tool is an equivalence between the sample complexity of (pure) differentially private learning of a concept class CC (or SCDP(C)SCDP(C)) and the randomized one-way communication complexity of the evaluation problem for concepts from CC. Using this equivalence we prove the following bounds: 1. SCDP(C)=Ω(LDim(C))SCDP(C) = \Omega(LDim(C)), where LDim(C)LDim(C) is the Littlestone's (1987) dimension characterizing the number of mistakes in the online-mistake-bound learning model. Known bounds on LDim(C)LDim(C) then imply that SCDP(C)SCDP(C) can be much higher than the VC-dimension of CC. 2. For any tt, there exists a class CC such that LDim(C)=2LDim(C)=2 but SCDP(C)tSCDP(C) \geq t. 3. For any tt, there exists a class CC such that the sample complexity of (pure) α\alpha-differentially private PAC learning is Ω(t/α)\Omega(t/\alpha) but the sample complexity of the relaxed (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-differentially private PAC learning is O(log(1/β)/α)O(\log(1/\beta)/\alpha). This resolves an open problem of Beimel et al. (2013b).Comment: Extended abstract appears in Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) 201

    Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially-Private Principal Components

    Full text link
    Principal components analysis (PCA) is a standard tool for identifying good low-dimensional approximations to data in high dimension. Many data sets of interest contain private or sensitive information about individuals. Algorithms which operate on such data should be sensitive to the privacy risks in publishing their outputs. Differential privacy is a framework for developing tradeoffs between privacy and the utility of these outputs. In this paper we investigate the theory and empirical performance of differentially private approximations to PCA and propose a new method which explicitly optimizes the utility of the output. We show that the sample complexity of the proposed method differs from the existing procedure in the scaling with the data dimension, and that our method is nearly optimal in terms of this scaling. We furthermore illustrate our results, showing that on real data there is a large performance gap between the existing method and our method.Comment: 37 pages, 8 figures; final version to appear in the Journal of Machine Learning Research, preliminary version was at NIPS 201

    Multitask Online Learning: Listen to the Neighborhood Buzz

    Full text link
    We study multitask online learning in a setting where agents can only exchange information with their neighbors on an arbitrary communication network. We introduce MT-CO2OL\texttt{MT-CO}_2\texttt{OL}, a decentralized algorithm for this setting whose regret depends on the interplay between the task similarities and the network structure. Our analysis shows that the regret of MT-CO2OL\texttt{MT-CO}_2\texttt{OL} is never worse (up to constants) than the bound obtained when agents do not share information. On the other hand, our bounds significantly improve when neighboring agents operate on similar tasks. In addition, we prove that our algorithm can be made differentially private with a negligible impact on the regret when the losses are linear. Finally, we provide experimental support for our theory

    Private Multiplicative Weights Beyond Linear Queries

    Full text link
    A wide variety of fundamental data analyses in machine learning, such as linear and logistic regression, require minimizing a convex function defined by the data. Since the data may contain sensitive information about individuals, and these analyses can leak that sensitive information, it is important to be able to solve convex minimization in a privacy-preserving way. A series of recent results show how to accurately solve a single convex minimization problem in a differentially private manner. However, the same data is often analyzed repeatedly, and little is known about solving multiple convex minimization problems with differential privacy. For simpler data analyses, such as linear queries, there are remarkable differentially private algorithms such as the private multiplicative weights mechanism (Hardt and Rothblum, FOCS 2010) that accurately answer exponentially many distinct queries. In this work, we extend these results to the case of convex minimization and show how to give accurate and differentially private solutions to *exponentially many* convex minimization problems on a sensitive dataset
    corecore