1,897 research outputs found
Detecting Privacy Leaks Through Existing Android Frameworks
The Android application ecosystem has thrived, with hundreds of thousands of applications (apps) available to users; however, not all of them are safe or privacy-friendly. Analyzing these many apps for malicious behaviors is an important but challenging area of research as malicious apps tend to use prevalent stealth techniques, e.g., encryption, code transformation, and other obfuscation approaches to bypass detection. Academic researchers and security companies have realized that the traditional signature-based and static analysis methods are inadequate to deal with this evolving
threat. In recent years, a number of static and dynamic code analysis proposals for analyzing Android apps have been introduced in academia and in the commercial world. Moreover, as a single detection approach may be ineffective against advanced obfuscation techniques, multiple frameworks for privacy leakage detection have been shown to yield better results when used in conjunction. In this dissertation, our contribution is two-fold. First, we organize 32 of the most recent and promising privacy-oriented proposals on Android apps analysis into two categories: static and dynamic analysis. For each category, we survey the state of-the-art proposals and provide a high-level overview of the methodology they rely on to detect privacy-sensitive leakages and app behaviors. Second, we choose one popular proposal from each category to analyze and detect leakages in 5,000 Android apps. Our toolchain setup consists of IntelliDroid (static) to find and trigger sensitive API (Application Program Interface) calls in target apps and leverages TaintDroid (dynamic) to detect leakages in these apps. We found that about 33%
of the tested apps leak privacy-sensitive information over the network (e.g., IMEI, location, UDID), which is consistent with existing work. Furthermore, we highlight the efficiency of combining IntelliDroid and TaintDroid in comparison with Android Monkey and TaintDroid as used in most prior work. We report an overall increase in the frequency of leakage of identifiers. This increase may indicate that IntelliDroid is a better approach over Android Monkey
A Multi-view Context-aware Approach to Android Malware Detection and Malicious Code Localization
Existing Android malware detection approaches use a variety of features such
as security sensitive APIs, system calls, control-flow structures and
information flows in conjunction with Machine Learning classifiers to achieve
accurate detection. Each of these feature sets provides a unique semantic
perspective (or view) of apps' behaviours with inherent strengths and
limitations. Meaning, some views are more amenable to detect certain attacks
but may not be suitable to characterise several other attacks. Most of the
existing malware detection approaches use only one (or a selected few) of the
aforementioned feature sets which prevent them from detecting a vast majority
of attacks. Addressing this limitation, we propose MKLDroid, a unified
framework that systematically integrates multiple views of apps for performing
comprehensive malware detection and malicious code localisation. The rationale
is that, while a malware app can disguise itself in some views, disguising in
every view while maintaining malicious intent will be much harder.
MKLDroid uses a graph kernel to capture structural and contextual information
from apps' dependency graphs and identify malice code patterns in each view.
Subsequently, it employs Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) to find a weighted
combination of the views which yields the best detection accuracy. Besides
multi-view learning, MKLDroid's unique and salient trait is its ability to
locate fine-grained malice code portions in dependency graphs (e.g.,
methods/classes). Through our large-scale experiments on several datasets
(incl. wild apps), we demonstrate that MKLDroid outperforms three
state-of-the-art techniques consistently, in terms of accuracy while
maintaining comparable efficiency. In our malicious code localisation
experiments on a dataset of repackaged malware, MKLDroid was able to identify
all the malice classes with 94% average recall
Eight years of rider measurement in the Android malware ecosystem: evolution and lessons learned
Despite the growing threat posed by Android malware,
the research community is still lacking a comprehensive
view of common behaviors and trends exposed by malware families
active on the platform. Without such view, the researchers
incur the risk of developing systems that only detect outdated
threats, missing the most recent ones. In this paper, we conduct
the largest measurement of Android malware behavior to date,
analyzing over 1.2 million malware samples that belong to 1.2K
families over a period of eight years (from 2010 to 2017). We
aim at understanding how the behavior of Android malware
has evolved over time, focusing on repackaging malware. In
this type of threats different innocuous apps are piggybacked
with a malicious payload (rider), allowing inexpensive malware
manufacturing.
One of the main challenges posed when studying repackaged
malware is slicing the app to split benign components apart from
the malicious ones. To address this problem, we use differential
analysis to isolate software components that are irrelevant to the
campaign and study the behavior of malicious riders alone. Our
analysis framework relies on collective repositories and recent
advances on the systematization of intelligence extracted from
multiple anti-virus vendors. We find that since its infancy in
2010, the Android malware ecosystem has changed significantly,
both in the type of malicious activity performed by the malicious
samples and in the level of obfuscation used by malware to avoid
detection. We then show that our framework can aid analysts
who attempt to study unknown malware families. Finally, we
discuss what our findings mean for Android malware detection
research, highlighting areas that need further attention by the
research community.Accepted manuscrip
Sound and Precise Malware Analysis for Android via Pushdown Reachability and Entry-Point Saturation
We present Anadroid, a static malware analysis framework for Android apps.
Anadroid exploits two techniques to soundly raise precision: (1) it uses a
pushdown system to precisely model dynamically dispatched interprocedural and
exception-driven control-flow; (2) it uses Entry-Point Saturation (EPS) to
soundly approximate all possible interleavings of asynchronous entry points in
Android applications. (It also integrates static taint-flow analysis and least
permissions analysis to expand the class of malicious behaviors which it can
catch.) Anadroid provides rich user interface support for human analysts which
must ultimately rule on the "maliciousness" of a behavior.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of Anadroid's malware analysis, we had teams
of analysts analyze a challenge suite of 52 Android applications released as
part of the Auto- mated Program Analysis for Cybersecurity (APAC) DARPA
program. The first team analyzed the apps using a ver- sion of Anadroid that
uses traditional (finite-state-machine-based) control-flow-analysis found in
existing malware analysis tools; the second team analyzed the apps using a
version of Anadroid that uses our enhanced pushdown-based
control-flow-analysis. We measured machine analysis time, human analyst time,
and their accuracy in flagging malicious applications. With pushdown analysis,
we found statistically significant (p < 0.05) decreases in time: from 85
minutes per app to 35 minutes per app in human plus machine analysis time; and
statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in accuracy with the
pushdown-driven analyzer: from 71% correct identification to 95% correct
identification.Comment: Appears in 3rd Annual ACM CCS workshop on Security and Privacy in
SmartPhones and Mobile Devices (SPSM'13), Berlin, Germany, 201
- …