A family of droids -- Android malware detection via behavioral modeling: static vs dynamic analysis

Following the increasing popularity of mobile ecosystems, cybercriminals have increasingly targeted them, designing and distributing malicious apps that steal information or cause harm to the device's owner. Aiming to counter them, detection techniques based on either static or dynamic analysis that model Android malware, have been proposed. While the pros and cons of these analysis techniques are known, they are usually compared in the context of their limitations e.g., static analysis is not able to capture runtime behaviors, full code coverage is usually not achieved during dynamic analysis, etc. Whereas, in this paper, we analyze the performance of static and dynamic analysis methods in the detection of Android malware and attempt to compare them in terms of their detection performance, using the same modeling approach. To this end, we build on MaMaDroid, a state-of-the-art detection system that relies on static analysis to create a behavioral model from the sequences of abstracted API calls. Then, aiming to apply the same technique in a dynamic analysis setting, we modify CHIMP, a platform recently proposed to crowdsource human inputs for app testing, in order to extract API calls' sequences from the traces produced while executing the app on a CHIMP virtual device. We call this system AuntieDroid and instantiate it by using both automated (Monkey) and user-generated inputs. We find that combining both static and dynamic analysis yields the best performance, with F-measure reaching 0.92. We also show that static analysis is at least as effective as dynamic analysis, depending on how apps are stimulated during execution, and, finally, investigate the reasons for inconsistent misclassifications across methods.Accepted manuscrip

A Family of Droids -- Android Malware Detection via Behavioral Modeling: Static vs Dynamic Analysis

Following the increasing popularity of mobile ecosystems, cybercriminals have increasingly targeted them, designing and distributing malicious apps that steal information or cause harm to the device's owner. Aiming to counter them, detection techniques based on either static or dynamic analysis that model Android malware, have been proposed. While the pros and cons of these analysis techniques are known, they are usually compared in the context of their limitations e.g., static analysis is not able to capture runtime behaviors, full code coverage is usually not achieved during dynamic analysis, etc. Whereas, in this paper, we analyze the performance of static and dynamic analysis methods in the detection of Android malware and attempt to compare them in terms of their detection performance, using the same modeling approach. To this end, we build on MaMaDroid, a state-of-the-art detection system that relies on static analysis to create a behavioral model from the sequences of abstracted API calls. Then, aiming to apply the same technique in a dynamic analysis setting, we modify CHIMP, a platform recently proposed to crowdsource human inputs for app testing, in order to extract API calls' sequences from the traces produced while executing the app on a CHIMP virtual device. We call this system AuntieDroid and instantiate it by using both automated (Monkey) and user-generated inputs. We find that combining both static and dynamic analysis yields the best performance, with F-measure reaching 0.92. We also show that static analysis is at least as effective as dynamic analysis, depending on how apps are stimulated during execution, and, finally, investigate the reasons for inconsistent misclassifications across methods.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in the Proceedings of 16th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST 2018). This is the full versio

Measuring and Mitigating Security and Privacy Issues on Android Applications

Over time, the increasing popularity of the Android operating system (OS) has resulted in its user-base surging past 1 billion unique devices. As a result, cybercriminals and other non-criminal actors are attracted to the OS due to the amount of user information they can access. Aiming to investigate security and privacy issues on the Android ecosystem, previous work has shown that it is possible for malevolent actors to steal users' sensitive personal information over the network, via malicious applications, or vulnerability exploits etc., presenting proof of concepts or evidences of exploits. Due to the ever-changing nature of the Android ecosystem and the arms race involved in detecting and mitigating malicious applications, it is important to continuously examine the ecosystem for security and privacy issues. This thesis presents research contributions in this space, and it is divided into two parts. The first part focuses on measuring and mitigating vulnerabilities in applications due to poor implementation of security and privacy protocols. In particular, we investigate the implementation of the SSL/TLS protocol validation logic, and properties such as ephemerality, anonymity, and end-to-end encryption. We show that, despite increased awareness of vulnerabilities in SSL/TLS implementation by application developers, these vulnerabilities are still present in popular applications, allowing malicious actors steal users' information. To help developers mitigate them, we provide useful recommendations such as enabling SSL/TLS pinning and using the same certificate validation logic in their test and development environments. The second part of this thesis focuses on the detection of malicious applications that compromise users' security and privacy, the detection performance of the different program analysis approach, and the influence of different input generators during dynamic analysis on detection performance. We present a novel method for detecting malicious applications, which is less susceptible to the evolution of the Android ecosystem (i.e., changes in the Android framework as a result of the addition/removal of API calls in new releases) and malware (i.e., changes in techniques to evade detection) compared to previous methods. Overall, this thesis contributes to knowledge around Android apps with respect to, vulnerability discovery that leads to loss of users' security and privacy, and the design of robust Android malware detection tools. It highlights the need for continual evaluation of apps as the ecosystem changes to detect and prevent vulnerabilities and malware that results in a compromise of users' security and privacy