3 research outputs found

    Analysis of BGP4 Peering Establishment Time on IPv6 Connection over 6PE and 6VPE

    Get PDF
    Nowadays, because of the exhaustion of IPv4 address space, IPv6 is increasingly being used on enterprise networks. Usually, an enterprise uses an MPLS network from a Service Provider to interconnect their IPv4 network sites. Although MPLS Service Providers mostly built their MPLS backbone based on IPv4, their MPLS backbone have the capability to transport IPv6 traffic of their customers. Two methods can be used by the MPLS Service Provider to connect its customer IPv6 network, which is 6PE (IPv6 Provider Edge Routers) and 6VPE (IPv6 VPN Provider Edge Router). Enterprises generally use a BGP routing protocol to interconnect their networks, and they need to use the best method that suits their requirement from their MPLS Service Provider to transport their IPv6 traffic (including the BGP protocol). The MPLS Service Providers need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of both methods. This paper illustrates the analysis of BGP4 (current BGP version) IPv6 peering establishment time over 6PE and 6VPE methods. The MPLS Service Providers can use the analysis results of this study to determine the suited method to interconnect its customers' IPv6 networks

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKS (SDN) AND CONVENTIONAL NETWORKS USING ROUTING PROTOCOLS

    Get PDF
    Conventional routing protocols such as RIP, OSPF, EIGRP and BGP have a very rigid and intricate system thus narrowing the adaptability of networks to the ever changing Internet, the emergence of Software Defined Networking (SDN) provides a solution for this problem. Due to the handiness of a centralized controller, SDN has provided an effective method in terms of routing computation and fine control over data packets. Due to the increase in unpredicted failures taking place the ability to predict/ know the approximate maximum time it takes for these networks to converge in order to avoid and/or minimize loss of packets/data during these failures has become crucial in today's world. This time that the routers in the network take to converge via the implemented routing protocol to resume communication or transfer of information again is called the routing convergence time. In this thesis, the performance is evaluated by measuring the routing convergence time during link failure with respect to the topology scale of the networks to show that SDN routing/forwarding is better compared to conventional routing. Further the results indicate that the routing convergence time is less in SDN networks on comparison with conventional networks when the topology scale is increased, indicating that SDN networks converge faster during link/node failures in comparison with Conventional networks and that routing convergence time is greatly influenced with the changing topological size/increasing network size. I believe that this work can throw light upon many advantages in SDN with regards to faster convergence during failures in contrast to archaic conventional networks
    corecore