Optimal Checkpointing for Secure Intermittently-Powered IoT Devices

Energy harvesting is a promising solution to power Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Due to the intermittent nature of these energy sources, one cannot guarantee forward progress of program execution. Prior work has advocated for checkpointing the intermediate state to off-chip non-volatile memory (NVM). Encrypting checkpoints addresses the security concern, but significantly increases the checkpointing overheads. In this paper, we propose a new online checkpointing policy that judiciously determines when to checkpoint so as to minimize application time to completion while guaranteeing security. Compared to state-of-the-art checkpointing schemes that do not account for the overheads of encrypted checkpoints we improve execution time up to 1.4x.Comment: ICCAD 201

Design considerations of a nonvolatile accumulator-based 8-bit processor

The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) and theconstant growth of portable electronics have leveraged the con-cern with energy consumption. Nonvolatile memory (NVM)emerged as a solution to mitigate the problem due to its abilityto retain data on sleep mode without a power supply. Non-volatile processors (NVPs) may further improve energy savingby using nonvolatile flip-flops (NVFFs) to store system state,allowing the device to be turned off when idle and resume ex-ecution instantly after power-on. In view of the potential pre-sented by NVPs, this work describes the initial steps to imple-ment a nonvolatile version of Neander, a hypothetical processorcreated for educational purposes. First, we implemented Ne-ander in Register Transfer Level (RTL), separating the com-binational logic from the sequential elements. Then, the lat-ter was replaced by circuit-level descriptions of volatile flip-flops. We then validated this implementation by employinga mixed-signal simulation over a set of benchmarks. Resultshave shown the expected behavior for the whole instructionset. Then, we implemented circuit-level descriptions of mag-netic tunnel junction (MTJ) based nonvolatile flip-flops, usingan open-source MTJ model. These elements were exhaustivelyvalidated using electrical simulations. With these results, weintend to carry on the implementation and fully equip our pro-cessor with nonvolatile features such as instant wake-up

Autonomous spacecraft maintenance study group

A plan to incorporate autonomous spacecraft maintenance (ASM) capabilities into Air Force spacecraft by 1989 is outlined. It includes the successful operation of the spacecraft without ground operator intervention for extended periods of time. Mechanisms, along with a fault tolerant data processing system (including a nonvolatile backup memory) and an autonomous navigation capability, are needed to replace the routine servicing that is presently performed by the ground system. The state of the art fault handling capabilities of various spacecraft and computers are described, and a set conceptual design requirements needed to achieve ASM is established. Implementations for near term technology development needed for an ASM proof of concept demonstration by 1985, and a research agenda addressing long range academic research for an advanced ASM system for 1990s are established

Design methods for fault-tolerant navigation computers

Design methods for fault tolerant navigation computer

An Energy-Efficient Design Paradigm for a Memory Cell Based on Novel Nanoelectromechanical Switches

In this chapter, we explain NEMsCAM cell, a new content-addressable memory (CAM) cell, which is designed based on both CMOS technologies and nanoelectromechanical (NEM) switches. The memory part of NEMsCAM is designed with two complementary nonvolatile NEM switches and located on top of the CMOS-based comparison component. As a use case, we evaluate first-level instruction and data translation lookaside buffers (TLBs) with 16 nm CMOS technology at 2 GHz. The simulation results demonstrate that the NEMsCAM TLB reduces the energy consumption per search operation (by 27%), standby mode (by 53.9%), write operation (by 41.9%), and the area (by 40.5%) compared to a CMOS-only TLB with minimal performance overhead