5,189 research outputs found
Pyramid: Enhancing Selectivity in Big Data Protection with Count Featurization
Protecting vast quantities of data poses a daunting challenge for the growing
number of organizations that collect, stockpile, and monetize it. The ability
to distinguish data that is actually needed from data collected "just in case"
would help these organizations to limit the latter's exposure to attack. A
natural approach might be to monitor data use and retain only the working-set
of in-use data in accessible storage; unused data can be evicted to a highly
protected store. However, many of today's big data applications rely on machine
learning (ML) workloads that are periodically retrained by accessing, and thus
exposing to attack, the entire data store. Training set minimization methods,
such as count featurization, are often used to limit the data needed to train
ML workloads to improve performance or scalability. We present Pyramid, a
limited-exposure data management system that builds upon count featurization to
enhance data protection. As such, Pyramid uniquely introduces both the idea and
proof-of-concept for leveraging training set minimization methods to instill
rigor and selectivity into big data management. We integrated Pyramid into
Spark Velox, a framework for ML-based targeting and personalization. We
evaluate it on three applications and show that Pyramid approaches
state-of-the-art models while training on less than 1% of the raw data
Linear and Range Counting under Metric-based Local Differential Privacy
Local differential privacy (LDP) enables private data sharing and analytics
without the need for a trusted data collector. Error-optimal primitives (for,
e.g., estimating means and item frequencies) under LDP have been well studied.
For analytical tasks such as range queries, however, the best known error bound
is dependent on the domain size of private data, which is potentially
prohibitive. This deficiency is inherent as LDP protects the same level of
indistinguishability between any pair of private data values for each data
downer.
In this paper, we utilize an extension of -LDP called Metric-LDP or
-LDP, where a metric defines heterogeneous privacy guarantees for
different pairs of private data values and thus provides a more flexible knob
than does to relax LDP and tune utility-privacy trade-offs. We show
that, under such privacy relaxations, for analytical workloads such as linear
counting, multi-dimensional range counting queries, and quantile queries, we
can achieve significant gains in utility. In particular, for range queries
under -LDP where the metric is the -distance function scaled by
, we design mechanisms with errors independent on the domain sizes;
instead, their errors depend on the metric , which specifies in what
granularity the private data is protected. We believe that the primitives we
design for -LDP will be useful in developing mechanisms for other analytical
tasks, and encourage the adoption of LDP in practice
An Economic Analysis of Privacy Protection and Statistical Accuracy as Social Choices
Statistical agencies face a dual mandate to publish accurate statistics while protecting respondent privacy. Increasing privacy protection requires decreased accuracy. Recognizing this as a resource allocation problem, we propose an economic solution: operate where the marginal cost of increasing privacy equals the marginal benefit. Our model of production, from computer science, assumes data are published using an efficient differentially private algorithm. Optimal choice weighs the demand for accurate statistics against the demand for privacy. Examples from U.S. statistical programs show how our framework can guide decision-making. Further progress requires a better understanding of willingness-to-pay for privacy and statistical accuracy
- …