On the Satisfiability of Quasi-Classical Description Logics

Though quasi-classical description logic (QCDL) can tolerate the inconsistency of description logic in reasoning, a knowledge base in QCDL possibly has no model. In this paper, we investigate the satisfiability of QCDL, namely, QC-coherency and QC-consistency and develop a tableau calculus, as a formal proof, to determine whether a knowledge base in QCDL is QC-consistent. To do so, we repair the standard tableau for DL by introducing several new expansion rules and defining a new closeness condition. Finally, we prove that this calculus is sound and complete. Based on this calculus, we implement an OWL paraconsistent reasoner called QC-OWL. Preliminary experiments show that QC-OWL is highly efficient in checking QC-consistency

From fuzzy to annotated semantic web languages

The aim of this chapter is to present a detailed, selfcontained and comprehensive account of the state of the art in representing and reasoning with fuzzy knowledge in Semantic Web Languages such as triple languages RDF/RDFS, conceptual languages of the OWL 2 family and rule languages. We further show how one may generalise them to so-called annotation domains, that cover also e.g. temporal and provenance extensions

Fuzzy Description Logics with General Concept Inclusions

Description logics (DLs) are used to represent knowledge of an application domain and provide standard reasoning services to infer consequences of this knowledge. However, classical DLs are not suited to represent vagueness in the description of the knowledge. We consider a combination of DLs and Fuzzy Logics to address this task. In particular, we consider the t-norm-based semantics for fuzzy DLs introduced by Hájek in 2005. Since then, many tableau algorithms have been developed for reasoning in fuzzy DLs. Another popular approach is to reduce fuzzy ontologies to classical ones and use existing highly optimized classical reasoners to deal with them. However, a systematic study of the computational complexity of the different reasoning problems is so far missing from the literature on fuzzy DLs. Recently, some of the developed tableau algorithms have been shown to be incorrect in the presence of general concept inclusion axioms (GCIs). In some fuzzy DLs, reasoning with GCIs has even turned out to be undecidable. This work provides a rigorous analysis of the boundary between decidable and undecidable reasoning problems in t-norm-based fuzzy DLs, in particular for GCIs. Existing undecidability proofs are extended to cover large classes of fuzzy DLs, and decidability is shown for most of the remaining logics considered here. Additionally, the computational complexity of reasoning in fuzzy DLs with semantics based on finite lattices is analyzed. For most decidability results, tight complexity bounds can be derived