Earnings-21: A Practical Benchmark for ASR in the Wild

Commonly used speech corpora inadequately challenge academic and commercial ASR systems. In particular, speech corpora lack metadata needed for detailed analysis and WER measurement. In response, we present Earnings-21, a 39-hour corpus of earnings calls containing entity-dense speech from nine different financial sectors. This corpus is intended to benchmark ASR systems in the wild with special attention towards named entity recognition. We benchmark four commercial ASR models, two internal models built with open-source tools, and an open-source LibriSpeech model and discuss their differences in performance on Earnings-21. Using our recently released fstalign tool, we provide a candid analysis of each model's recognition capabilities under different partitions. Our analysis finds that ASR accuracy for certain NER categories is poor, presenting a significant impediment to transcript comprehension and usage. Earnings-21 bridges academic and commercial ASR system evaluation and enables further research on entity modeling and WER on real world audio.Comment: Accepted to INTERSPEECH 2021. June 15 2021: Addressing the comments of reviewers and updating the results of our internal ESPNet model. The results do not change our conclusions. April 28th, 2021: We found and resolved an issue in our experimental evaluation that scored the LibriSpeech model at ~20% worse relative WER than the actual WER. The updated results do not affect our conclusion

Utterance-level Permutation Invariant Training with Latency-controlled BLSTM for Single-channel Multi-talker Speech Separation

Utterance-level permutation invariant training (uPIT) has achieved promising progress on single-channel multi-talker speech separation task. Long short-term memory (LSTM) and bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) are widely used as the separation networks of uPIT, i.e. uPIT-LSTM and uPIT-BLSTM. uPIT-LSTM has lower latency but worse performance, while uPIT-BLSTM has better performance but higher latency. In this paper, we propose using latency-controlled BLSTM (LC-BLSTM) during inference to fulfill low-latency and good-performance speech separation. To find a better training strategy for BLSTM-based separation network, chunk-level PIT (cPIT) and uPIT are compared. The experimental results show that uPIT outperforms cPIT when LC-BLSTM is used during inference. It is also found that the inter-chunk speaker tracing (ST) can further improve the separation performance of uPIT-LC-BLSTM. Evaluated on the WSJ0 two-talker mixed-speech separation task, the absolute gap of signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) between uPIT-BLSTM and uPIT-LC-BLSTM is reduced to within 0.7 dB.Comment: Proceedings of APSIPA Annual Summit and Conference 2019, 18-21 November 2019, Lanzhou, Chin

Deep Learning for Human Affect Recognition: Insights and New Developments

Automatic human affect recognition is a key step towards more natural human-computer interaction. Recent trends include recognition in the wild using a fusion of audiovisual and physiological sensors, a challenging setting for conventional machine learning algorithms. Since 2010, novel deep learning algorithms have been applied increasingly in this field. In this paper, we review the literature on human affect recognition between 2010 and 2017, with a special focus on approaches using deep neural networks. By classifying a total of 950 studies according to their usage of shallow or deep architectures, we are able to show a trend towards deep learning. Reviewing a subset of 233 studies that employ deep neural networks, we comprehensively quantify their applications in this field. We find that deep learning is used for learning of (i) spatial feature representations, (ii) temporal feature representations, and (iii) joint feature representations for multimodal sensor data. Exemplary state-of-the-art architectures illustrate the progress. Our findings show the role deep architectures will play in human affect recognition, and can serve as a reference point for researchers working on related applications.Comment: To be published in IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 20 pages, 7 figures, 6 table