3 research outputs found

    Defending against adversarial attacks on medical imaging AI system, classification or detection?

    Full text link
    Medical imaging AI systems such as disease classification and segmentation are increasingly inspired and transformed from computer vision based AI systems. Although an array of adversarial training and/or loss function based defense techniques have been developed and proved to be effective in computer vision, defending against adversarial attacks on medical images remains largely an uncharted territory due to the following unique challenges: 1) label scarcity in medical images significantly limits adversarial generalizability of the AI system; 2) vastly similar and dominant fore- and background in medical images make it hard samples for learning the discriminating features between different disease classes; and 3) crafted adversarial noises added to the entire medical image as opposed to the focused organ target can make clean and adversarial examples more discriminate than that between different disease classes. In this paper, we propose a novel robust medical imaging AI framework based on Semi-Supervised Adversarial Training (SSAT) and Unsupervised Adversarial Detection (UAD), followed by designing a new measure for assessing systems adversarial risk. We systematically demonstrate the advantages of our robust medical imaging AI system over the existing adversarial defense techniques under diverse real-world settings of adversarial attacks using a benchmark OCT imaging data set

    Bias Field Poses a Threat to DNN-based X-Ray Recognition

    Full text link
    The chest X-ray plays a key role in screening and diagnosis of many lung diseases including the COVID-19. More recently, many works construct deep neural networks (DNNs) for chest X-ray images to realize automated and efficient diagnosis of lung diseases. However, bias field caused by the improper medical image acquisition process widely exists in the chest X-ray images while the robustness of DNNs to the bias field is rarely explored, which definitely poses a threat to the X-ray-based automated diagnosis system. In this paper, we study this problem based on the recent adversarial attack and propose a brand new attack, i.e., the adversarial bias field attack where the bias field instead of the additive noise works as the adversarial perturbations for fooling the DNNs. This novel attack posts a key problem: how to locally tune the bias field to realize high attack success rate while maintaining its spatial smoothness to guarantee high realisticity. These two goals contradict each other and thus has made the attack significantly challenging. To overcome this challenge, we propose the adversarial-smooth bias field attack that can locally tune the bias field with joint smooth & adversarial constraints. As a result, the adversarial X-ray images can not only fool the DNNs effectively but also retain very high level of realisticity. We validate our method on real chest X-ray datasets with powerful DNNs, e.g., ResNet50, DenseNet121, and MobileNet, and show different properties to the state-of-the-art attacks in both image realisticity and attack transferability. Our method reveals the potential threat to the DNN-based X-ray automated diagnosis and can definitely benefit the development of bias-field-robust automated diagnosis system.Comment: 9 pages, 6 figure

    Certifiably Robust Interpretation via Renyi Differential Privacy

    Full text link
    Motivated by the recent discovery that the interpretation maps of CNNs could easily be manipulated by adversarial attacks against network interpretability, we study the problem of interpretation robustness from a new perspective of \Renyi differential privacy (RDP). The advantages of our Renyi-Robust-Smooth (RDP-based interpretation method) are three-folds. First, it can offer provable and certifiable top-kk robustness. That is, the top-kk important attributions of the interpretation map are provably robust under any input perturbation with bounded ℓd\ell_d-norm (for any d≥1d\geq 1, including d=∞d = \infty). Second, our proposed method offers ∼10%\sim10\% better experimental robustness than existing approaches in terms of the top-kk attributions. Remarkably, the accuracy of Renyi-Robust-Smooth also outperforms existing approaches. Third, our method can provide a smooth tradeoff between robustness and computational efficiency. Experimentally, its top-kk attributions are {\em twice} more robust than existing approaches when the computational resources are highly constrained.Comment: 19 page main text + appendi
    corecore