Reducing Library Characterization Time for Cell-aware Test while Maintaining Test Quality

Cell-aware test (CAT) explicitly targets faults caused by defects inside library cells to improve test quality, compared with conventional automatic test pattern generation (ATPG) approaches, which target faults only at the boundaries of library cells. The CAT methodology consists of two stages. Stage 1, based on dedicated analog simulation, library characterization per cell identifies which cell-level test pattern detects which cell-internal defect; this detection information is encoded in a defect detection matrix (DDM). In Stage 2, with the DDMs as inputs, cell-aware ATPG generates chip-level test patterns per circuit design that is build up of interconnected instances of library cells. This paper focuses on Stage 1, library characterization, as both test quality and cost are determined by the set of cell-internal defects identified and simulated in the CAT tool flow. With the aim to achieve the best test quality, we first propose an approach to identify a comprehensive set, referred to as full set, of potential open- and short-defect locations based on cell layout. However, the full set of defects can be large even for a single cell, making the time cost of the defect simulation in Stage 1 unaffordable. Subsequently, to reduce the simulation time, we collapse the full set to a compact set of defects which serves as input of the defect simulation. The full set is stored for the diagnosis and failure analysis. With inspecting the simulation results, we propose a method to verify the test quality based on the compact set of defects and, if necessary, to compensate the test quality to the same level as that based on the full set of defects. For 351 combinational library cells in Cadence’s GPDK045 45nm library, we simulate only 5.4% defects from the full set to achieve the same test quality based on the full set of defects. In total, the simulation time, via linear extrapolation per cell, would be reduced by 96.4% compared with the time based on the full set of defects

Defect-location identification for cell-aware test

Cell-aware test (CAT) explicitly targets defects inside library cells and therefore significantly reduces the amount of test escapes compared to conventional automatic test pattern generation (ATPG). Our CAT flow consists of three steps: (1) defect-location identification (DLI), (2) defect characterization based on detailed analog simulation of the cells, and (3) cell-aware automatic test pattern generation (ATPG). This paper focuses on Step 1, as quality and cost are determined by the set of cell-internal defect locations considered in the remainder of the flow. Based on technology inputs from the user and a parasitic extraction (PEX) run that analyzes the cell layouts, we derive a set of open defects on and short defects between both transistor terminals and intra-cell interconnects. The full set of defect locations is stored for later use during failure analysis. Through dedicated DLI algorithms, we identify a compact subset of defect locations for defect characterization and ATPG, in which we include only one representative defect location for each set of equivalent defects locations. For Cadence’s GPDK045 library, the compact subset contains only 2.8% of the full set of defect locations and reduces the time required for defect characterization with the same ratio

Defect-location identification for cell-aware test

Cell-aware test (CAT) explicitly targets defects inside library cells and therefore significantly reduces the amount of test escapes compared to conventional automatic test pattern generation (ATPG). Our CAT flow consists of three steps: (1) defect-location identification (DLI), (2) defect characterization based on\u3cbr/\u3edetailed analog simulation of the cells, and (3) cell-aware automatic test pattern generation (ATPG). This paper focuses on Step 1, as quality and cost are determined by the set of cell-internal defect locations considered in the remainder of the flow. Based on technology inputs from the user and a parasitic extraction (PEX) run that analyzes the cell layouts, we derive a set of open defects on and short defects between both transistor terminals and intra-cell interconnects. The full set of defect locations is stored for later use during failure analysis. Through dedicated DLI algorithms, we identify a compact subset of defect locations for defect characterization and ATPG, in which we include only\u3cbr/\u3eone representative defect location for each set of equivalent defects locations. For Cadence’s GPDK045 library, the compact subset contains only 2.8% of the full set of defect locations and reduces the time required for defect characterization with the same ratio