2 research outputs found

    Width Parameterizations for Knot-free Vertex Deletion on Digraphs

    Full text link
    A knot in a directed graph GG is a strongly connected subgraph QQ of GG with at least two vertices, such that no vertex in V(Q)V(Q) is an in-neighbor of a vertex in V(G)∖V(Q)V(G)\setminus V(Q). Knots are important graph structures, because they characterize the existence of deadlocks in a classical distributed computation model, the so-called OR-model. Deadlock detection is correlated with the recognition of knot-free graphs as well as deadlock resolution is closely related to the {\sc Knot-Free Vertex Deletion (KFVD)} problem, which consists of determining whether an input graph GG has a subset S⊆V(G)S \subseteq V(G) of size at most kk such that G[V∖S]G[V\setminus S] contains no knot. In this paper we focus on graph width measure parameterizations for {\sc KFVD}. First, we show that: (i) {\sc KFVD} parameterized by the size of the solution kk is W[1]-hard even when pp, the length of a longest directed path of the input graph, as well as Îș\kappa, its Kenny-width, are bounded by constants, and we remark that {\sc KFVD} is para-NP-hard even considering many directed width measures as parameters, but in FPT when parameterized by clique-width; (ii) {\sc KFVD} can be solved in time 2O(tw)×n2^{O(tw)}\times n, but assuming ETH it cannot be solved in 2o(tw)×nO(1)2^{o(tw)}\times n^{O(1)}, where twtw is the treewidth of the underlying undirected graph. Finally, since the size of a minimum directed feedback vertex set (dfvdfv) is an upper bound for the size of a minimum knot-free vertex deletion set, we investigate parameterization by dfvdfv and we show that (iii) {\sc KFVD} can be solved in FPT-time parameterized by either dfv+Îșdfv+\kappa or dfv+pdfv+p; and it admits a Turing kernel by the distance to a DAG having an Hamiltonian path.Comment: An extended abstract of this paper was published in IPEC 201
    corecore