6,397 research outputs found

    Health Participatory Sensing Networks for Mobile Device Public Health Data Collection and Intervention

    Get PDF
    The pervasive availability and increasingly sophisticated functionalities of smartphones and their connected external sensors or wearable devices can provide new data collection capabilities relevant to public health. Current research and commercial efforts have concentrated on sensor-based collection of health data for personal fitness and personal healthcare feedback purposes. However, to date there has not been a detailed investigation of how such smartphones and sensors can be utilized for public health data collection. Unlike most sensing applications, in the case of public health, capturing comprehensive and detailed data is not a necessity, as aggregate data alone is in many cases sufficient for public health purposes. As such, public health data has the characteristic of being capturable whilst still not infringing privacy, as the detailed data of individuals that may allow re-identification is not needed, but rather only aggregate, de-identified and non-unique data for an individual. These types of public health data collection provide the challenge of the need to be flexible enough to answer a range of public health queries, while ensuring the level of detail returned preserves privacy. Additionally, the distribution of public health data collection request and other information to the participants without identifying the individual is a core requirement. An additional requirement for health participatory sensing networks is the ability to perform public health interventions. As with data collection, this needs to be completed in a non-identifying and privacy preserving manner. This thesis proposes a solution to these challenges, whereby a form of query assurance provides private and secure distribution of data collection requests and public health interventions to participants. While an additional, privacy preserving threshold approach to local processing of data prior to submission is used to provide re-identification protection for the participant. The evaluation finds that with manageable overheads, minimal reduction in the detail of collected data and strict communication privacy; privacy and anonymity can be preserved. This is significant for the field of participatory health sensing as a major concern of participants is most often real or perceived privacy risks of contribution

    Crowd-ML: A Privacy-Preserving Learning Framework for a Crowd of Smart Devices

    Full text link
    Smart devices with built-in sensors, computational capabilities, and network connectivity have become increasingly pervasive. The crowds of smart devices offer opportunities to collectively sense and perform computing tasks in an unprecedented scale. This paper presents Crowd-ML, a privacy-preserving machine learning framework for a crowd of smart devices, which can solve a wide range of learning problems for crowdsensing data with differential privacy guarantees. Crowd-ML endows a crowdsensing system with an ability to learn classifiers or predictors online from crowdsensing data privately with minimal computational overheads on devices and servers, suitable for a practical and large-scale employment of the framework. We analyze the performance and the scalability of Crowd-ML, and implement the system with off-the-shelf smartphones as a proof of concept. We demonstrate the advantages of Crowd-ML with real and simulated experiments under various conditions

    Quality of Information in Mobile Crowdsensing: Survey and Research Challenges

    Full text link
    Smartphones have become the most pervasive devices in people's lives, and are clearly transforming the way we live and perceive technology. Today's smartphones benefit from almost ubiquitous Internet connectivity and come equipped with a plethora of inexpensive yet powerful embedded sensors, such as accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, and camera. This unique combination has enabled revolutionary applications based on the mobile crowdsensing paradigm, such as real-time road traffic monitoring, air and noise pollution, crime control, and wildlife monitoring, just to name a few. Differently from prior sensing paradigms, humans are now the primary actors of the sensing process, since they become fundamental in retrieving reliable and up-to-date information about the event being monitored. As humans may behave unreliably or maliciously, assessing and guaranteeing Quality of Information (QoI) becomes more important than ever. In this paper, we provide a new framework for defining and enforcing the QoI in mobile crowdsensing, and analyze in depth the current state-of-the-art on the topic. We also outline novel research challenges, along with possible directions of future work.Comment: To appear in ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN

    Location Privacy in Spatial Crowdsourcing

    Full text link
    Spatial crowdsourcing (SC) is a new platform that engages individuals in collecting and analyzing environmental, social and other spatiotemporal information. With SC, requesters outsource their spatiotemporal tasks to a set of workers, who will perform the tasks by physically traveling to the tasks' locations. This chapter identifies privacy threats toward both workers and requesters during the two main phases of spatial crowdsourcing, tasking and reporting. Tasking is the process of identifying which tasks should be assigned to which workers. This process is handled by a spatial crowdsourcing server (SC-server). The latter phase is reporting, in which workers travel to the tasks' locations, complete the tasks and upload their reports to the SC-server. The challenge is to enable effective and efficient tasking as well as reporting in SC without disclosing the actual locations of workers (at least until they agree to perform a task) and the tasks themselves (at least to workers who are not assigned to those tasks). This chapter aims to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in protecting users' location privacy in spatial crowdsourcing. We provide a comparative study of a diverse set of solutions in terms of task publishing modes (push vs. pull), problem focuses (tasking and reporting), threats (server, requester and worker), and underlying technical approaches (from pseudonymity, cloaking, and perturbation to exchange-based and encryption-based techniques). The strengths and drawbacks of the techniques are highlighted, leading to a discussion of open problems and future work

    Incentive Mechanisms for Participatory Sensing: Survey and Research Challenges

    Full text link
    Participatory sensing is a powerful paradigm which takes advantage of smartphones to collect and analyze data beyond the scale of what was previously possible. Given that participatory sensing systems rely completely on the users' willingness to submit up-to-date and accurate information, it is paramount to effectively incentivize users' active and reliable participation. In this paper, we survey existing literature on incentive mechanisms for participatory sensing systems. In particular, we present a taxonomy of existing incentive mechanisms for participatory sensing systems, which are subsequently discussed in depth by comparing and contrasting different approaches. Finally, we discuss an agenda of open research challenges in incentivizing users in participatory sensing.Comment: Updated version, 4/25/201
    • …
    corecore