7,723 research outputs found
Quality of Information in Mobile Crowdsensing: Survey and Research Challenges
Smartphones have become the most pervasive devices in people's lives, and are
clearly transforming the way we live and perceive technology. Today's
smartphones benefit from almost ubiquitous Internet connectivity and come
equipped with a plethora of inexpensive yet powerful embedded sensors, such as
accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone, and camera. This unique combination has
enabled revolutionary applications based on the mobile crowdsensing paradigm,
such as real-time road traffic monitoring, air and noise pollution, crime
control, and wildlife monitoring, just to name a few. Differently from prior
sensing paradigms, humans are now the primary actors of the sensing process,
since they become fundamental in retrieving reliable and up-to-date information
about the event being monitored. As humans may behave unreliably or
maliciously, assessing and guaranteeing Quality of Information (QoI) becomes
more important than ever. In this paper, we provide a new framework for
defining and enforcing the QoI in mobile crowdsensing, and analyze in depth the
current state-of-the-art on the topic. We also outline novel research
challenges, along with possible directions of future work.Comment: To appear in ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN
A Collaborative Mechanism for Crowdsourcing Prediction Problems
Machine Learning competitions such as the Netflix Prize have proven
reasonably successful as a method of "crowdsourcing" prediction tasks. But
these competitions have a number of weaknesses, particularly in the incentive
structure they create for the participants. We propose a new approach, called a
Crowdsourced Learning Mechanism, in which participants collaboratively "learn"
a hypothesis for a given prediction task. The approach draws heavily from the
concept of a prediction market, where traders bet on the likelihood of a future
event. In our framework, the mechanism continues to publish the current
hypothesis, and participants can modify this hypothesis by wagering on an
update. The critical incentive property is that a participant will profit an
amount that scales according to how much her update improves performance on a
released test set.Comment: Full version of the extended abstract which appeared in NIPS 201
- …