Contributions to unsupervised and semi-supervised learning

This thesis studies two problems in theoretical machine learning. The first part of the thesis investigates the statistical stability of clustering algorithms. In the second part, we study the relative advantage of having unlabeled data in classification problems. Clustering stability was proposed and used as a model selection method in clustering tasks. The main idea of the method is that from a given data set two independent samples are taken. Each sample individually is clustered with the same clustering algorithm, with the same setting of its parameters. If the two resulting clusterings turn out to be close in some metric, it is concluded that the clustering algorithm and the setting of its parameters match the data set, and that clusterings obtained are meaningful. We study asymptotic properties of this method for certain types of cost minimizing clustering algorithms and relate their asymptotic stability to the number of optimal solutions of the underlying optimization problem. In classification problems, it is often expensive to obtain labeled data, but on the other hand, unlabeled data are often plentiful and cheap. We study how the access to unlabeled data can decrease the amount of labeled data needed in the worst-case sense. We propose an extension of the probably approximately correct (PAC) model in which this question can be naturally studied. We show that for certain basic tasks the access to unlabeled data might, at best, halve the amount of labeled data needed