Confidence intervals for the difference between the coefficients of variation of Weibull distributions for analyzing wind speed dispersion

Wind energy is an important renewable energy source for generating electricity that has the potential to replace fossil fuels. Herein, we propose confidence intervals for the difference between the coefficients of variation of Weibull distributions constructed using the concepts of the generalized confidence interval (GCI), Bayesian methods, the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER) based on Hendricks and Robey’s confidence interval, a percentile bootstrap method, and a bootstrap method with standard errors. To analyze their performances, their coverage probabilities and expected lengths were evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation results indicate that the coverage probabilities of GCI were greater than or sometimes close to the nominal confidence level. However, when the Weibull shape parameter was small, the Bayesian- highest posterior density interval was preferable. All of the proposed confidence intervals were applied to wind speed data measured at 90-meter wind energy potential stations at various regions in Thailand

Comparison analysis on the coefficients of variation of two independent Birnbaum-Saunders distributions by constructing confidence intervals for the ratio of coefficients of variation

The fatigue failure of materials can be investigated by applying the Birnbaum-Saunders (BS) distribution to fatigue failure datasets. The coefficient of variation (CV) is an important descriptive statistic that is widely used to measure the dispersion of data. In addition, for two independent datasets following BS distributions, the ratio of their CVs can be used to compare their CVs, especially when the difference is small, and constructing confidence intervals for this scenario is of interest in this study. Hence, we propose new confidence intervals for the ratio of the CVs from two BS distributions by using the bootstrap confidence interval (BCI), the fiducial generalized confidence interval (FGCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval approaches. The performances of the proposed confidence intervals were compared with the generalized confidence interval (GCI) in terms of their coverage probabilities and average lengths via Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicate that the HPD interval outperformed the others when the coverage probabilities and the average lengths were both considered together. The efficacies of the proposed methods and GCI are illustrated using real datasets of the fatigue life of 6061-T6 aluminum coupons