3,265 research outputs found

    Kirchhoff Index As a Measure of Edge Centrality in Weighted Networks: Nearly Linear Time Algorithms

    Full text link
    Most previous work of centralities focuses on metrics of vertex importance and methods for identifying powerful vertices, while related work for edges is much lesser, especially for weighted networks, due to the computational challenge. In this paper, we propose to use the well-known Kirchhoff index as the measure of edge centrality in weighted networks, called θ\theta-Kirchhoff edge centrality. The Kirchhoff index of a network is defined as the sum of effective resistances over all vertex pairs. The centrality of an edge ee is reflected in the increase of Kirchhoff index of the network when the edge ee is partially deactivated, characterized by a parameter θ\theta. We define two equivalent measures for θ\theta-Kirchhoff edge centrality. Both are global metrics and have a better discriminating power than commonly used measures, based on local or partial structural information of networks, e.g. edge betweenness and spanning edge centrality. Despite the strong advantages of Kirchhoff index as a centrality measure and its wide applications, computing the exact value of Kirchhoff edge centrality for each edge in a graph is computationally demanding. To solve this problem, for each of the θ\theta-Kirchhoff edge centrality metrics, we present an efficient algorithm to compute its ϵ\epsilon-approximation for all the mm edges in nearly linear time in mm. The proposed θ\theta-Kirchhoff edge centrality is the first global metric of edge importance that can be provably approximated in nearly-linear time. Moreover, according to the θ\theta-Kirchhoff edge centrality, we present a θ\theta-Kirchhoff vertex centrality measure, as well as a fast algorithm that can compute ϵ\epsilon-approximate Kirchhoff vertex centrality for all the nn vertices in nearly linear time in mm

    Polarization dependence of the third-harmonic generation in multiband superconductors

    Full text link
    In a superconductor the third-harmonic generation (THG) of a strong THz pulse is enhanced below Tc by the resonant excitation of lattice-modulated charge fluctuations (LCF), which modulate the response according to the polarization of the field. Here we compute the THG within a multiband model for the prototype NbN superconductor. We show that the non-resonant contribution coming from the instantaneous electronic response and the finite width of the pulse significantly suppress the polarization dependence of the signal, challenging its observation in real systems.Comment: Final version, as publishe

    Sampling Random Spanning Trees Faster than Matrix Multiplication

    Full text link
    We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in O~(n4/3m1/2+n2)\tilde{O}(n^{4/3}m^{1/2}+n^{2}) time (The O~()\tilde{O}(\cdot) notation hides polylog(n)\operatorname{polylog}(n) factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, O(nω)O(n^\omega). For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of O~(min{nω,mn,m4/3})\tilde{O}(\min\{n^{\omega},m\sqrt{n},m^{4/3}\}) for mn5/3m \gg n^{5/3} (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute ϵ\epsilon-approximate effective resistances for a set SS of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in O~(m+(n+S)ϵ2)\tilde{O}(m+(n + |S|)\epsilon^{-2}) time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires O~(min{(m+S)ϵ2,m+nϵ4+Sϵ2})\tilde{O}( \min\{(m + |S|)\epsilon^{-2}, m+n\epsilon^{-4} +|S|\epsilon^{-2}\}) time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate
    corecore