Identifying Compiler and Optimization Options from Binary Code using Deep Learning Approaches

D. Pizzolotto and K. Inoue, "Identifying Compiler and Optimization Options from Binary Code using Deep Learning Approaches," 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), Adelaide, Australia, 2020, pp. 232-242, doi: 10.1109/ICSME46990.2020.00031

An Integrated Program Representation for Loop Optimizations

Inspite of all the advances, automatic parallelization has not entered the general purpose compiling environment for several reasons. There have been two distinct schools of thought in parallelization domain namely, affine and non-affine which have remained incompatible with each other over the years. Thus, a good practical compiler will have to be able to analyze and parallelize any type of code - affine or non-affine or a mix of both. To be able to achieve the best performance, compilers will have to derive the order of transformations best suitable for a given program on a given system. This problem, known as "Phase Ordering", is a very crucial impedance for practical compilers, more so for parallelizing compilers. The ideal compiler should be able to consider various orders of transformations and reason about the performance benefits of the same. In order to achieve such a compiler, in this paper, we propose a unified program representation which has the following characteristics: a) Modular in nature. b) Ability to represent both ane and non-ane transformations. c) Ability to use detailed static run-time estimators directly on the representation

Portable compiler optimisation across embedded programs and microarchitectures using machine learning

Building an optimising compiler is a difficult and time consuming task which must be repeated for each generation of a microprocessor. As the underlying microarchitecture changes from one generation to the next, the compiler must be retuned to optimise specifically for that new system. It may take several releases of the compiler to effectively exploit a processor’s performance potential, by which time a new generation has appeared and the process starts again. We address this challenge by developing a portable optimising compiler. Our approach employs machine learning to automatically learn the best optimisations to apply for any new program on a new microarchitectural configuration. It achieves this by learning a model off-line which maps a microarchitecture description plus the hardware counters from a single run of the program to the best compiler optimisation passes. Our compiler gains 67 % of the maximum speedup obtainable by an iterative compiler search using 1000 evaluations. We obtain, on average, a 1.16x speedup over the highest default optimisation level across an entire microarchitecture configuration space, achieving a 4.3x speedup in the best case. We demonstrate the robustness of this technique by applying it to an extended microarchitectural space where we achieve comparable performance

A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine Learning

Since the mid-1990s, researchers have been trying to use machine-learning based approaches to solve a number of different compiler optimization problems. These techniques primarily enhance the quality of the obtained results and, more importantly, make it feasible to tackle two main compiler optimization problems: optimization selection (choosing which optimizations to apply) and phase-ordering (choosing the order of applying optimizations). The compiler optimization space continues to grow due to the advancement of applications, increasing number of compiler optimizations, and new target architectures. Generic optimization passes in compilers cannot fully leverage newly introduced optimizations and, therefore, cannot keep up with the pace of increasing options. This survey summarizes and classifies the recent advances in using machine learning for the compiler optimization field, particularly on the two major problems of (1) selecting the best optimizations and (2) the phase-ordering of optimizations. The survey highlights the approaches taken so far, the obtained results, the fine-grain classification among different approaches and finally, the influential papers of the field.Comment: version 5.0 (updated on September 2018)- Preprint Version For our Accepted Journal @ ACM CSUR 2018 (42 pages) - This survey will be updated quarterly here (Send me your new published papers to be added in the subsequent version) History: Received November 2016; Revised August 2017; Revised February 2018; Accepted March 2018