Compositional competitiveness for distributed algorithms

We define a measure of competitive performance for distributed algorithms based on throughput, the number of tasks that an algorithm can carry out in a fixed amount of work. This new measure complements the latency measure of Ajtai et al., which measures how quickly an algorithm can finish tasks that start at specified times. The novel feature of the throughput measure, which distinguishes it from the latency measure, is that it is compositional: it supports a notion of algorithms that are competitive relative to a class of subroutines, with the property that an algorithm that is k-competitive relative to a class of subroutines, combined with an l-competitive member of that class, gives a combined algorithm that is kl-competitive. In particular, we prove the throughput-competitiveness of a class of algorithms for collect operations, in which each of a group of n processes obtains all values stored in an array of n registers. Collects are a fundamental building block of a wide variety of shared-memory distributed algorithms, and we show that several such algorithms are competitive relative to collects. Inserting a competitive collect in these algorithms gives the first examples of competitive distributed algorithms obtained by composition using a general construction.Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures; full version of STOC 96 paper titled "Modular competitiveness for distributed algorithms.

Stay or Switch: Competitive Online Algorithms for Energy Plan Selection in Energy Markets with Retail Choice

Energy markets with retail choice enable customers to switch energy plans among competitive retail suppliers. Despite the promising benefits of more affordable prices and better savings to customers, there appears subsided participation in energy retail markets from residential customers. One major reason is the complex online decision-making process for selecting the best energy plan from a multitude of options that hinders average consumers. In this paper, we shed light on the online energy plan selection problem by providing effective competitive online algorithms. We first formulate the online energy plan selection problem as a metrical task system problem with temporally dependent switching costs. For the case of constant cancellation fee, we present a 3-competitive deterministic online algorithm and a 2-competitive randomized online algorithm for solving the energy plan selection problem. We show that the two competitive ratios are the best possible among deterministic and randomized online algorithms, respectively. We further extend our online algorithms to the case where the cancellation fee is linearly proportional to the residual contract duration. Through empirical evaluations using real-world household and energy plan data, we show that our deterministic online algorithm can produce on average 14.6% cost saving, as compared to 16.2% by the offline optimal algorithm, while our randomized online algorithm can further improve cost saving by up to 0.5%.Comment: e-Energy 2019 technical repor