What Are the Factors that Influence Caregiver/Parent Co-sleeping Education?

poster abstractBackground: In the United States, 13% of infants routinely co-sleep with a caregiver, and 50% of infants share a bed with a caregiver for part of the night. Co-sleeping has been identified as a risk factor for infant death by Sudden Unexplained Infant Death Syndrome (SUIDS). The purpose of this research was to carry out a systematic review for determining best practices related to education to caregivers on the risks of co-sleeping. Method: After a rigorous multi-database search, we accessed 100 research articles related to SUIDS from years 2002-2015 for inclusion for this review. A total of 20 papers related to co-sleeping and SUIDS met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for validity by a primary and secondary reviewer via standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Due to the articles’ descriptive methods, NOTARI (Narrative, Opinion, and Text Assessment and Review Instrument) was used to appraise, extract data, and thematically organize the findings resulting in meta-aggregation. Results: The data extracted included specific details for co-sleeping. We identified that a) educational, b) family dynamics, c) racial/cultural, and d) socioeconomic factors were the significant concepts that influenced the caregivers’ attitude toward co-sleeping and their likelihood to co-sleep. Heterogeneity for the study’s methods was represented in the results. Conclusions: Many caregivers and families that practice co-sleeping display resistance to education about the discontinuation of co-sleeping based on the belief that healthcare providers do not take into account the family’s personal situation. The caregivers are more likely to be receptive to advice regarding safer co-sleeping practices as opposed to omitting the practice of co-sleeping. Family-centered interventions and tailored education delivered by nurses should be identified. Caregiver safe practices for sleep, taking into account situational factors such as socioeconomic level, race, culture, and core beliefs, should be encouraged

Parent-infant co-sleeping and the implications for sudden infant death syndrome

In 2015 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its 2006 guideline to clarify the association between parent infant co-sleeping and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The practice of co-sleeping is a topic of continuing controversy and debate. Rather than highlighting the risks, the emphasis of the NICE guideline is to provide parents with balanced information so that they can make informed decisions about where their babies sleep. This contradicts previous public health messages on co-sleeping that discourages parents from the practice. Consequently, the updated national guideline has been criticised for failing to provide parents with safer sleep information, which has led to widespread confusion for parents and professionals. Health professionals can deliver safer sleep advice to support parents in their decision-making. However, as a result of inconsistent guidelines and evidence about parent-infant co-sleeping, health professionals may feel apprehensive and ill-equipped to provide advice and support. This article draws on a non-exhaustive literature review to discuss the risks and benefits of parent-infant co-sleeping, and the implications of this practice for SIDS. It also aims to provide transparency and improve understanding for health professionals so that they can support parents to adopt safer sleep strategies for their baby

Sleep patterns of Japanese preschool children and their parents: implications for co-sleeping

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the direct relationship of sleep schedule and sleep quality variables between healthy preschool children and their parents, focusing on the influence of the difference in bedtime between each other. Methods Forty-seven Japanese 5-year-old children and their primary parent were studied. The parents completed questionnaires including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The children wore an actigraph for one week. Results Although sleep patterns of children were generally independent of their parents, late sleep end time and bedtime of children were associated with parents' late sleep end time on weekends. For 87% of children and parents who shared a bedroom, sleep quality was negatively affected by a shorter difference in bedtimes between child and parent, but not by co-sleeping. Conclusion Sleep behaviours of parents can influence those of their children. For parents and children who share a bedroom, the timing of bedtime rather than co-sleeping may be a key factor in modulating sleep patterns. Trying to get children asleep and subsequently falling asleep at a similar time may disturb parents' sleep quality, which may subsequently affect that of their children

Social and behavioural factors in Non-suspicious unexpected death in infancy; experience from metropolitan police project indigo investigation

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) are well described, and such cases are now investigated according to standard protocols. In London, Project Indigo of the Metropolitan Police provides a unique, detailed framework for such data collection. We investigate such data to provide a contemporary account of SUDI in a large city and further link data to publically available datasets to investigate interactions with social factors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data routinely collected by the Metropolitan Police Service in all cases of non-suspicious SUDI deaths in London during a six year period. RESULTS: SUDI deaths are associated with markers of social deprivation in London. A significant proportion of such deaths are associated with potentially modifiable risk factors such as cigarette smoking and co-sleeping, such behaviour also being associated with social factors, including accommodation issues. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely collected data provide valuable insight into patterns and associations of mortality, with SUDI remaining a significant issue in London. Risk factors include social disadvantage, which may manifest in part by affecting behavioural patterns such as co-sleeping and public health interventions to reduce rates require significant social modification

Sleep

There is much received wisdom on infant sleep and new parents will find that just about everyone they speak to has an opinion – where, how much, how often. For parents, understanding infant sleep and adapting to new patterns and behaviours can be one of the biggest challenges in the early years. Unsurprisingly, sleep is one of the main concerns presented by parents to child and family health nurses. By giving parents information about sleep, they can be better prepared to promote and support healthy sleep patterns in their infants (Middlemiss, 2004). During sleep we all go through cycles of deep and light sleep. An adult’s sleep cycle lasts around 90 minutes, but an infant’s cycle is shorter, lasting 20 to 50 minutes. Deep sleep is quiet sleep; babies are mostly still and breathe evenly, but will sometimes jerk or startle. During light, active sleep, babies look restless, groan, sometimes open their eyes and even wake up completely. The amount of time we spend in each phase of sleep varies depending on age. Newborns spend about half their sleeping time in a light, active sleep, but by three years old, only one third of sleep time is active. This continues to reduce as children grow older. Understanding the physiological basics of sleep – cycles, patterns, phases and how much we need at different ages – can help health professionals and parents make better sense of infant sleep behaviours. For example, frequent night waking can be a problem for some parents but is in fact a normal part of an infant’s sleep cycle. There’s even an argument that night waking serves protective functions by allowing frequent feeding and creating the opportunity for emotional reconnection and brain stimulation. It may be helpful for parents to focus on improving their infant’s ability to self-settle rather than on the frequent waking.&nbsp