Anchor-Based Correction of Substitutions in Indexed Sets

Motivated by DNA-based data storage, we investigate a system where digital information is stored in an unordered set of several vectors over a finite alphabet. Each vector begins with a unique index that represents its position in the whole data set and does not contain data. This paper deals with the design of error-correcting codes for such indexed sets in the presence of substitution errors. We propose a construction that efficiently deals with the challenges that arise when designing codes for unordered sets. Using a novel mechanism, called anchoring, we show that it is possible to combat the ordering loss of sequences with only a small amount of redundancy, which allows to use standard coding techniques, such as tensor-product codes to correct errors within the sequences. We finally derive upper and lower bounds on the achievable redundancy of codes within the considered channel model and verify that our construction yields a redundancy that is close to the best possible achievable one. Our results surprisingly indicate that it requires less redundancy to correct errors in the indices than in the data part of vectors.Comment: 5 page

Robust Indexing for the Sliced Channel: Almost Optimal Codes for Substitutions and Deletions

Encoding data as a set of unordered strings is receiving great attention as it captures one of the basic features of DNA storage systems. However, the challenge of constructing optimal redundancy codes for this channel remained elusive. In this paper, we address this problem and present an order-wise optimal construction of codes that are capable of correcting multiple substitution, deletion, and insertion errors for this channel model. The key ingredient in the code construction is a technique we call robust indexing: simultaneously assigning indices to unordered strings (hence, creating order) and also embedding information in these indices. The encoded indices are resilient to substitution, deletion, and insertion errors, and therefore, so is the entire code