3 research outputs found
Homology invariants of quadratic maps
Given a real projective algebraic set X we could hope that the equations describing it can give some information on its topology, e.g. on the number of its connected components. Unfortunately in the general case this hope is too vague and there is no direct way to extract such information from the algebraic description of X: Even the problem to decide whether X is empty or not is far from an easy visualization and requires some complicated algebraic machinery. A fi rst step observation is that as long as we are interested only in the topology of X, we can replace, using some Veronese embedding, the original ambient space with a much bigger RPn and assume that X is cut by quadratic equations. The price for this is the increase of the number of equations de ning our set; the advantage is that quadratic polynomials are easier to handle and our hope becomes more concrete..
Aν μμ μν μ΄λμμ λν μ΄ μλμ±
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬) -- μμΈλνκ΅λνμ : μμ°κ³Όνλν μ리과νλΆ, 2023. 8. κΆμ¬ν.We propose a new approach to the study of representations of quantum affine (su-per)algebras, motivated from super duality. Namely, we study a category of interest by finding its bosonic or fermionic counterpart, and then construct supersymmetric analogues and functors to interpolate bosons and fermions. A key role is played by R-matrices and their spectral decompositions, which enables a uniform treatment for super and non-super cases.
In this thesis, we consider two module categories of quantum affine (super)algebras of type A. First, the category of polynomial representations is studied, where a uniform approach is possible thanks to the powerful SchurβWeyl-type duality. We construct a functor that directly relates the category for quantum affine algebras to the one for superalgebras, and lift it to an equivalence between inverse limits of categories.
Second, we introduce a category of infinite-dimensional representations called q-oscillator representations, whose irreducible objects naturally correspond to finite-dimensional irreducible representations. Since the former can be seen as a bosonic counterpart of the latter, we explain the correspondence by introducing an analogous category for quantum affine superalgebras. In the spirit of super duality, the connection provided by the super analogue is expected to give rise to an equivalence of categories.λ³Έ νμλ
Όλ¬Έμ μμ μν (μ΄)λμμ ννλ‘ μ κ΄ν μ΄ μλμ±μ κΈ°λ°μ λ μλ‘μ΄ μ κ·Όμ μ μνλ€. ꡬ체μ μΌλ‘λ, μ£Όμ΄μ§ λ²μ£Όλ₯Ό λΆμνκΈ° μνμ¬ μ°μ 보μ νΉμ νλ₯΄λ―Έμ¨ μ§μ μ°Ύκ³ , κ·Έ μ΄λμΉ μ μ¬μ²΄λ₯Ό ꡬμ±νμ¬ λ³΄μ μΈ‘κ³Ό νλ₯΄λ―Έμ¨ μΈ‘μ μ΄μ΄μ£Όλ ν¨μλ₯Ό μ°Ύλ λ°©λ²μ΄λ€. μ΄λ μ£Όμν μν μ νλ κ²μ΄ R-νλ ¬κ³Ό κ·Έ μ€ννΈλ΄ λΆν΄λ‘, μ΄λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ κ°κ°μ κ²½μ°λ₯Ό κΈ°μ‘΄μ μ μλ €μ§ μ νμ°¨μ ννλ‘ κ³Ό μ μ¬ν λ°©μμΌλ‘ λΆμν μ μλ€.
λ³Έ νμλ
Όλ¬Έμμλ Aν μμ μν (μ΄)λμμ λ κ°μ§ λͺ¨λ λ²μ£Όλ₯Ό κ³ λ €νκ³ μ νλ€. μ²«μ§Έλ‘ λ€λ£¨μ΄μ§λ κ²μ λ€νμ ννλ€μ λ²μ£Όλ‘, μ΄ κ²½μ°μλ μ μ©ν μμ΄βλ°μΌ λ₯μ μλμ±μ μ΄μ©νμ¬ νΉν ν΅μΌμ μΈ λΆμμ΄ κ°λ₯νμλ€. μμ μν μ΄λμμ λν λ²μ£Όμ κΈ°μ‘΄μ μμ μν λμμ λν λ²μ£Όλ₯Ό μ§μ μ μΌλ‘ μ°κ²°νλ ν¨μλ₯Ό 건μ€νμκ³ , μ΄λ‘λΆν° λ²μ£Όλ€μ μκ·Ήν μ¬μ΄μ λ²μ£Ό λμΉλ₯Ό μ»κ² λλ€.
λμ§Έλ‘, q-μ§λμ ννμ΄λΌ λΆλ¦¬λ 무νμ°¨μ ννλ€μ λ²μ£Όλ₯Ό λμ
νμκ³ , μ νμ°¨μ κΈ°μ½ ννλ€κ³Ό μμ°μ€λ½κ² λμλλ κΈ°μ½ q-μ§λμ ννλ€μ μ°Ύμλ€. q-μ§λμ ννλ€μ μ νμ°¨μ ννλ€μ 보μ μ§μΌλ‘ λ³Ό μ μκΈ° λλ¬Έμ μμ μν μ΄λμμ λν μ μ¬ν λͺ¨λ λ²μ£Όλ₯Ό λμ
ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μ΄ λμμ μ€λͺ
ν μ μμμΌλ©°, μ΄λ¬ν μ΄λμΉ μ μ¬μ²΄λ₯Ό ν΅ν q-μ§λμμ μ νμ°¨μ ννλ€ μ¬μ΄μ μ°κ²°μ μ΄ μλμ±μ μ² νμ μν΄ λ²μ£Όλ€μ λμΉλ‘ μ΄μ΄μ§ κ²μΌλ‘ μμλλ€.1 Introduction 1
1.1 Quantum affine superalgebras 2
1.2 Super duality 3
1.3 Main results 4
1.3.1 Generalized quantum groups 5
1.3.2 Super duality for polynomial representations 6
1.3.3 Oscillator representations and super duality 8
1.4 Organization 10
2 Preliminaries 12
2.1 General linear Lie superalgebra gl_MN 13
2.2 Quantum affine algebra 17
2.2.1 Affine Lie algebras and quantum affine algebras 17
2.2.2 Finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras 20
2.3 Quiver Hecke algebra 25
2.3.1 Quiver Hecke algebra 26
2.3.2 Quiver Hecke algebra of type A and their simple modules 30
3 Generalized Quantum Groups of type A 33
3.1 Generalized quantum group of affine type A 34
3.1.1 Definition 34
3.1.2 Quantum affine superalgebra and algebra isomorphism 36
3.1.3 Universal R-matrix 39
3.2 Finite type subalgebra and its polynomial representations 43
4 Super duality for polynomial representations 47
4.1 Super duality for polynomial representations of gl_n 48
4.2 Finite-dimensional representations of U(Ξ΅) 52
4.2.1 Fundamental representations 52
4.2.2 R-matrix 55
4.2.3 Fusion construction of irreducible polynomial representations 59
4.2.4 Generalized quantum affine Schur-Weyl duality 62
4.3 Super duality 66
4.3.1 Truncation 67
4.3.2 Equivalence of duality functors 72
4.3.3 Inverse limit category 77
4.3.4 Super duality 81
5 Oscillator representations of U_q(gl_n) 85
5.1 Howe duality and oscillator representations of gl_n 86
5.2 Oscillator representations of U_q(gl_n) 91
5.2.1 Fock space and fundamental q-oscillator representations 92
5.2.2 Oscillator representations of U_q(gl_n) 95
5.3 Oscillator representations of U_q(\hat{gl}_n) 102
5.3.1 Category O_osc,Ξ΅ 102
5.3.2 R-matrix and spectral decomposition 104
5.3.3 Fusion construction of irreducible q-oscillator representations 110
5.3.4 Correspondence of irreducibles and super duality 112
6 Proofs 115
6.1 Chapter 4 115
6.1.1 Proof of Lemma 4.2.6 115
6.1.2 Proof of Theorem 4.3.13 120
6.2 Chapter 5 126
6.2.1 Proof of Proposition 5.3.2 126
6.2.2 Proof of Conjecture 5.3.16 for s=1 128
Abstract(in Korean) 142λ°