10,330 research outputs found

    Stochastic domination: the contact process, Ising models and FKG measures

    Get PDF
    We prove for the contact process on ZdZ^d, and many other graphs, that the upper invariant measure dominates a homogeneous product measure with large density if the infection rate λ\lambda is sufficiently large. As a consequence, this measure percolates if the corresponding product measure percolates. We raise the question of whether domination holds in the symmetric case for all infinite graphs of bounded degree. We study some asymmetric examples which we feel shed some light on this question. We next obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for domination of a product measure for ``downward'' FKG measures. As a consequence of this general result, we show that the plus and minus states for the Ising model on ZdZ^d dominate the same set of product measures. We show that this latter fact fails completely on the homogenous 3-ary tree. We also provide a different distinction between ZdZ^d and the homogenous 3-ary tree concerning stochastic domination and Ising models; while it is known that the plus states for different temperatures on ZdZ^d are never stochastically ordered, on the homogenous 3-ary tree, almost the complete opposite is the case. Next, we show that on ZdZ^d, the set of product measures which the plus state for the Ising model dominates is strictly increasing in the temperature. Finally, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for a finite number of variables, which are both FKG and exchangeable, to dominate a given product measure.Comment: 27 page

    Disjoint Dominating Sets with a Perfect Matching

    Full text link
    In this paper, we consider dominating sets DD and D′D' such that DD and D′D' are disjoint and there exists a perfect matching between them. Let DDm(G)DD_{\textrm{m}}(G) denote the cardinality of smallest such sets D,D′D, D' in GG (provided they exist, otherwise DDm(G)=∞DD_{\textrm{m}}(G) = \infty). This concept was introduced in [Klostermeyer et al., Theory and Application of Graphs, 2017] in the context of studying a certain graph protection problem. We characterize the trees TT for which DDm(T)DD_{\textrm{m}}(T) equals a certain graph protection parameter and for which DDm(T)=α(T)DD_{\textrm{m}}(T) = \alpha(T), where α(G)\alpha(G) is the independence number of GG. We also further study this parameter in graph products, e.g., by giving bounds for grid graphs, and in graphs of small independence number

    Semitotal domination in trees

    Full text link
    In this paper, we study a parameter that is squeezed between arguably the two important domination parameters, namely the domination number, γ(G)\gamma(G), and the total domination number, γt(G)\gamma_t(G). A set SS of vertices in GG is a semitotal dominating set of GG if it is a dominating set of GG and every vertex in S is within distance 22 of another vertex of SS. The semitotal domination number, γt2(G)\gamma_{t2}(G), is the minimum cardinality of a semitotal dominating set of GG. We observe that γ(G)≤γt2(G)≤γt(G)\gamma(G)\leq \gamma_{t2}(G)\leq \gamma_t(G). In this paper, we give a lower bound for the semitotal domination number of trees and we characterize the extremal trees. In addition, we characterize trees with equal domination and semitotal domination numbers.Comment: revise
    • …
    corecore