A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging

A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care

Diffusionâ weighted imaging outside the brain: Consensus statement from an ISMRMâ sponsored workshop

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134160/1/jmri25196_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134160/2/jmri25196.pd

The complementary role of imaging and tumor biomarkers in gynecological cancers: an update of the literature

Gynecological tumors, including endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer, have increased in incidence over time. The widespread introduction of screening programs and advances in diagnostic imaging methods has lead to a progressive increase in gynecological cancer detection. Accurate diagnosis and proper monitoring of disease remain the primary target for a successful treatment. In the last years, knowledge about cancer biomarkers has considerably increased providing great opportunities for improving cancer detection and treatment. In addition, in the last few years there has been an important development of imaging techniques. Nowadays, a multimodal approach including the evaluation of serum tumor biomarkers combined with imaging techniques, seems to be the best strategy for assessing tumor presence, spread, recurrence, and/or the response to treatment in female cancer patients In this review we provide an overview of the application of biomarkers combined with novel imaging methods and highlight their roles in female cancer diagnosis and follow-up

Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications

Judgement, as one of the core tenets of medicine, relies upon the integration of multilayered data with nuanced decision making. Cancer offers a unique context for medical decisions given not only its variegated forms with evolution of disease but also the need to take into account the individual condition of patients, their ability to receive treatment, and their responses to treatment. Challenges remain in the accurate detection, characterization, and monitoring of cancers despite improved technologies. Radiographic assessment of disease most commonly relies upon visual evaluations, the interpretations of which may be augmented by advanced computational analyses. In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) promises to make great strides in the qualitative interpretation of cancer imaging by expert clinicians, including volumetric delineation of tumors over time, extrapolation of the tumor genotype and biological course from its radiographic phenotype, prediction of clinical outcome, and assessment of the impact of disease and treatment on adjacent organs. AI may automate processes in the initial interpretation of images and shift the clinical workflow of radiographic detection, management decisions on whether or not to administer an intervention, and subsequent observation to a yet to be envisioned paradigm. Here, the authors review the current state of AI as applied to medical imaging of cancer and describe advances in 4 tumor types (lung, brain, breast, and prostate) to illustrate how common clinical problems are being addressed. Although most studies evaluating AI applications in oncology to date have not been vigorously validated for reproducibility and generalizability, the results do highlight increasingly concerted efforts in pushing AI technology to clinical use and to impact future directions in cancer care

Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review

: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications

HE4 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses

Ovarian masses, a common finding among pre- and post-menopausal women, can be benign or malignant. Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy among women living in industrialized countries. According to the current guidelines, measurement of CA125 tumor marker remains the gold standard in the management of ovarian cancer. Recently, HE4 has been proposed as emerging biomarker in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses and in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian tumors is very important for correct patient referral to institutions specializing in care and management of ovarian cancer. Tumor markers CA125 and HE4 are currently incorporated into the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm” (ROMA) with menopausal status for discerning malignant from benign pelvic masses. The availability of a good biomarker such as HE4, closely associated with the differential and early diagnosis of ovarian cancer, could reduce medical costs related to more expensive diagnostic procedures. Finally, it is important to note that HE4 identifies platinum non-responders thus enabling a switch to second line chemotherapy and improved survival

Developing multiparametric and novel magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for prostate cancer

Whilst biomarker research is gaining momentum within the cancer sciences, disappointingly few biomarkers are successfully translated into clinical practice, which is partly due to lack of rigorous methodology. In this thesis, I aim to systematically study several quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers (QIBs), at various stages of biomarker development for use as tools in the assessment of local and metastatic prostate cancer according to clinical need. I initially focus on QIBs derived from conventional multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI sequences, namely T2 weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE). Firstly, by optimising analytical methods used throughout the thesis, deciding which approach is more reliable between single-slice region-of-interest vs. contouring the whole tumour volume using two different software packages. I then consider whether metric reproducibility can be improved by normalisation to different anatomical structures, and assess whether it is preferable to use statistics derived from imaging histograms rather than the current convention of using mean values. I combine multiple QIBs in a logistic regression model to predict a Gleason 4 component in known prostate cancer, which represents an unmet clinical need, as noninvasive tools to distinguish these more aggressive tumours do not currently exist. I subsequently ‘technically validate’ a novel microstructural diffusion-weighted MRI technique called VERDICT (Vascular, Extracellular and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumours) to detect aggressive prostate cancer as part of a prospective cohort study. I assess the image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio, repeatability and performance of quantitative parametric VERDICT maps to discriminate between Gleason grades vs. the current best performing, but still imperfect tool of ADC. In the final two results chapters, motivated by the limited diagnostic accuracy of the prostate cancer staging modalities in current clinical use, I investigate the ability of mp whole-body (WB) MRI to stage aggressive cancer outside the prostate in patients with a high risk of metastases at primary diagnosis, and in biochemical failure following prostatectomy