462 research outputs found
On Revenue Monotonicity in Combinatorial Auctions
Along with substantial progress made recently in designing near-optimal
mechanisms for multi-item auctions, interesting structural questions have also
been raised and studied. In particular, is it true that the seller can always
extract more revenue from a market where the buyers value the items higher than
another market? In this paper we obtain such a revenue monotonicity result in a
general setting. Precisely, consider the revenue-maximizing combinatorial
auction for items and buyers in the Bayesian setting, specified by a
valuation function and a set of independent item-type
distributions. Let denote the maximum revenue achievable under
by any incentive compatible mechanism. Intuitively, one would expect that
if distribution stochastically dominates .
Surprisingly, Hart and Reny (2012) showed that this is not always true even for
the simple case when is additive. A natural question arises: Are these
deviations contained within bounds? To what extent may the monotonicity
intuition still be valid? We present an {approximate monotonicity} theorem for
the class of fractionally subadditive (XOS) valuation functions , showing
that if stochastically dominates under
where is a universal constant. Previously, approximate monotonicity was
known only for the case : Babaioff et al. (2014) for the class of additive
valuations, and Rubinstein and Weinberg (2015) for all subaddtive valuation
functions.Comment: 10 page
Randomized Revenue Monotone Mechanisms for Online Advertising
Online advertising is the main source of revenue for many Internet firms. A
central component of online advertising is the underlying mechanism that
selects and prices the winning ads for a given ad slot. In this paper we study
designing a mechanism for the Combinatorial Auction with Identical Items (CAII)
in which we are interested in selling identical items to a group of bidders
each demanding a certain number of items between and . CAII generalizes
important online advertising scenarios such as image-text and video-pod
auctions [GK14]. In image-text auction we want to fill an advertising slot on a
publisher's web page with either text-ads or a single image-ad and in
video-pod auction we want to fill an advertising break of seconds with
video-ads of possibly different durations.
Our goal is to design truthful mechanisms that satisfy Revenue Monotonicity
(RM). RM is a natural constraint which states that the revenue of a mechanism
should not decrease if the number of participants increases or if a participant
increases her bid.
[GK14] showed that no deterministic RM mechanism can attain PoRM of less than
for CAII, i.e., no deterministic mechanism can attain more than
fraction of the maximum social welfare. [GK14] also design a
mechanism with PoRM of for CAII.
In this paper, we seek to overcome the impossibility result of [GK14] for
deterministic mechanisms by using the power of randomization. We show that by
using randomization, one can attain a constant PoRM. In particular, we design a
randomized RM mechanism with PoRM of for CAII
Envy Freedom and Prior-free Mechanism Design
We consider the provision of an abstract service to single-dimensional
agents. Our model includes position auctions, single-minded combinatorial
auctions, and constrained matching markets. When the agents' values are drawn
from a distribution, the Bayesian optimal mechanism is given by Myerson (1981)
as a virtual-surplus optimizer. We develop a framework for prior-free mechanism
design and analysis. A good mechanism in our framework approximates the optimal
mechanism for the distribution if there is a distribution; moreover, when there
is no distribution this mechanism still performs well.
We define and characterize optimal envy-free outcomes in symmetric
single-dimensional environments. Our characterization mirrors Myerson's theory.
Furthermore, unlike in mechanism design where there is no point-wise optimal
mechanism, there is always a point-wise optimal envy-free outcome.
Envy-free outcomes and incentive-compatible mechanisms are similar in
structure and performance. We therefore use the optimal envy-free revenue as a
benchmark for measuring the performance of a prior-free mechanism. A good
mechanism is one that approximates the envy free benchmark on any profile of
agent values. We show that good mechanisms exist, and in particular, a natural
generalization of the random sampling auction of Goldberg et al. (2001) is a
constant approximation
Bribeproof mechanisms for two-values domains
Schummer (Journal of Economic Theory 2000) introduced the concept of
bribeproof mechanism which, in a context where monetary transfer between agents
is possible, requires that manipulations through bribes are ruled out.
Unfortunately, in many domains, the only bribeproof mechanisms are the trivial
ones which return a fixed outcome.
This work presents one of the few constructions of non-trivial bribeproof
mechanisms for these quasi-linear environments. Though the suggested
construction applies to rather restricted domains, the results obtained are
tight: For several natural problems, the method yields the only possible
bribeproof mechanism and no such mechanism is possible on more general domains.Comment: Extended abstract accepted to SAGT 2016. This ArXiv version corrects
typos in the proofs of Theorem 7 and Claims 28-29 of prior ArXiv versio
- …