12,785 research outputs found
Spectral centrality measures in complex networks
Complex networks are characterized by heterogeneous distributions of the
degree of nodes, which produce a large diversification of the roles of the
nodes within the network. Several centrality measures have been introduced to
rank nodes based on their topological importance within a graph. Here we review
and compare centrality measures based on spectral properties of graph matrices.
We shall focus on PageRank, eigenvector centrality and the hub/authority scores
of HITS. We derive simple relations between the measures and the (in)degree of
the nodes, in some limits. We also compare the rankings obtained with different
centrality measures.Comment: 11 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables. Final version published in Physical
Review
The impact of partially missing communities~on the reliability of centrality measures
Network data is usually not error-free, and the absence of some nodes is a
very common type of measurement error. Studies have shown that the reliability
of centrality measures is severely affected by missing nodes. This paper
investigates the reliability of centrality measures when missing nodes are
likely to belong to the same community. We study the behavior of five commonly
used centrality measures in uniform and scale-free networks in various error
scenarios. We find that centrality measures are generally more reliable when
missing nodes are likely to belong to the same community than in cases in which
nodes are missing uniformly at random. In scale-free networks, the betweenness
centrality becomes, however, less reliable when missing nodes are more likely
to belong to the same community. Moreover, centrality measures in scale-free
networks are more reliable in networks with stronger community structure. In
contrast, we do not observe this effect for uniform networks. Our observations
suggest that the impact of missing nodes on the reliability of centrality
measures might not be as severe as the literature suggests
Correlation Between Student Collaboration Network Centrality and Academic Performance
We compute nodal centrality measures on the collaboration networks of
students enrolled in three upper-division physics courses, usually taken
sequentially, at the Colorado School of Mines. These are complex networks in
which links between students indicate assistance with homework. The courses
included in the study are intermediate Classical Mechanics, introductory
Quantum Mechanics, and intermediate Electromagnetism. By correlating these
nodal centrality measures with students' scores on homework and exams, we find
four centrality measures that correlate significantly with students' homework
scores in all three courses: in-strength, out-strength, closeness centrality,
and harmonic centrality. These correlations suggest that students who not only
collaborate often, but also collaborate significantly with many different
people tend to achieve higher grades. Centrality measures between simultaneous
collaboration networks (analytical vs. numerical homework collaboration)
composed of the same students also correlate with each other, suggesting that
students' collaboration strategies remain relatively stable when presented with
homework assignments targeting different skills. Additionally, we correlate
centrality measures between collaboration networks from different courses and
find that the four centrality measures with the strongest relationship to
students' homework scores are also the most stable measures across networks
involving different courses. Correlations of centrality measures with exam
scores were generally smaller than the correlations with homework scores,
though this finding varied across courses.Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. PE
Centrality measures for graphons: Accounting for uncertainty in networks
As relational datasets modeled as graphs keep increasing in size and their
data-acquisition is permeated by uncertainty, graph-based analysis techniques
can become computationally and conceptually challenging. In particular, node
centrality measures rely on the assumption that the graph is perfectly known --
a premise not necessarily fulfilled for large, uncertain networks. Accordingly,
centrality measures may fail to faithfully extract the importance of nodes in
the presence of uncertainty. To mitigate these problems, we suggest a
statistical approach based on graphon theory: we introduce formal definitions
of centrality measures for graphons and establish their connections to
classical graph centrality measures. A key advantage of this approach is that
centrality measures defined at the modeling level of graphons are inherently
robust to stochastic variations of specific graph realizations. Using the
theory of linear integral operators, we define degree, eigenvector, Katz and
PageRank centrality functions for graphons and establish concentration
inequalities demonstrating that graphon centrality functions arise naturally as
limits of their counterparts defined on sequences of graphs of increasing size.
The same concentration inequalities also provide high-probability bounds
between the graphon centrality functions and the centrality measures on any
sampled graph, thereby establishing a measure of uncertainty of the measured
centrality score. The same concentration inequalities also provide
high-probability bounds between the graphon centrality functions and the
centrality measures on any sampled graph, thereby establishing a measure of
uncertainty of the measured centrality score.Comment: Authors ordered alphabetically, all authors contributed equally. 21
pages, 7 figure
Centrality Measures for Networks with Community Structure
Understanding the network structure, and finding out the influential nodes is
a challenging issue in the large networks. Identifying the most influential
nodes in the network can be useful in many applications like immunization of
nodes in case of epidemic spreading, during intentional attacks on complex
networks. A lot of research is done to devise centrality measures which could
efficiently identify the most influential nodes in the network. There are two
major approaches to the problem: On one hand, deterministic strategies that
exploit knowledge about the overall network topology in order to find the
influential nodes, while on the other end, random strategies are completely
agnostic about the network structure. Centrality measures that can deal with a
limited knowledge of the network structure are required. Indeed, in practice,
information about the global structure of the overall network is rarely
available or hard to acquire. Even if available, the structure of the network
might be too large that it is too much computationally expensive to calculate
global centrality measures. To that end, a centrality measure is proposed that
requires information only at the community level to identify the influential
nodes in the network. Indeed, most of the real-world networks exhibit a
community structure that can be exploited efficiently to discover the
influential nodes. We performed a comparative evaluation of prominent global
deterministic strategies together with stochastic strategies with an available
and the proposed deterministic community-based strategy. Effectiveness of the
proposed method is evaluated by performing experiments on synthetic and
real-world networks with community structure in the case of immunization of
nodes for epidemic control.Comment: 30 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication in Physica A. arXiv
admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1411.627
Maximal-entropy random walk unifies centrality measures
In this paper analogies between different (dis)similarity matrices are
derived. These matrices, which are connected to path enumeration and random
walks, are used in community detection methods or in computation of centrality
measures for complex networks. The focus is on a number of known centrality
measures, which inherit the connections established for similarity matrices.
These measures are based on the principal eigenvector of the adjacency matrix,
path enumeration, as well as on the stationary state, stochastic matrix or mean
first-passage times of a random walk. Particular attention is paid to the
maximal-entropy random walk, which serves as a very distinct alternative to the
ordinary random walk used in network analysis.
The various importance measures, defined both with the use of ordinary random
walk and the maximal-entropy random walk, are compared numerically on a set of
benchmark graphs. It is shown that groups of centrality measures defined with
the two random walks cluster into two separate families. In particular, the
group of centralities for the maximal-entropy random walk, connected to the
eigenvector centrality and path enumeration, is strongly distinct from all the
other measures and produces largely equivalent results.Comment: 7 pages, 2 figure
Eigenvector-Based Centrality Measures for Temporal Networks
Numerous centrality measures have been developed to quantify the importances
of nodes in time-independent networks, and many of them can be expressed as the
leading eigenvector of some matrix. With the increasing availability of network
data that changes in time, it is important to extend such eigenvector-based
centrality measures to time-dependent networks. In this paper, we introduce a
principled generalization of network centrality measures that is valid for any
eigenvector-based centrality. We consider a temporal network with N nodes as a
sequence of T layers that describe the network during different time windows,
and we couple centrality matrices for the layers into a supra-centrality matrix
of size NTxNT whose dominant eigenvector gives the centrality of each node i at
each time t. We refer to this eigenvector and its components as a joint
centrality, as it reflects the importances of both the node i and the time
layer t. We also introduce the concepts of marginal and conditional
centralities, which facilitate the study of centrality trajectories over time.
We find that the strength of coupling between layers is important for
determining multiscale properties of centrality, such as localization phenomena
and the time scale of centrality changes. In the strong-coupling regime, we
derive expressions for time-averaged centralities, which are given by the
zeroth-order terms of a singular perturbation expansion. We also study
first-order terms to obtain first-order-mover scores, which concisely describe
the magnitude of nodes' centrality changes over time. As examples, we apply our
method to three empirical temporal networks: the United States Ph.D. exchange
in mathematics, costarring relationships among top-billed actors during the
Golden Age of Hollywood, and citations of decisions from the United States
Supreme Court.Comment: 38 pages, 7 figures, and 5 table
- …