Can we rely on smartphone applications?

Smartphones are becoming necessary tools in the daily lives of millions of users who rely on these devices and their applications. There are thousands of applications for smartphone devices such as the iPhone, Blackberry, and Android, thus their reliability has become paramount for their users. This work aims to answer two related questions: (1) Can we assess the reliability of mobile applications by using the traditional reliability models? (2) Can we model adequately the failure data collected from many users? Firstly, it has been proved that the three most used software reliability models have fallen short of the mark when applied to smartphone applications; their failures were traced back to specific features of mobile applications. Secondly, it has been demonstrated that the Weibull and Gamma distribution models can adequately fit the observed failure data, thus providing better means to predict the reliability of smartphone applications

RELIABILITY MODELS FOR SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS

Smartphones have become the most used electronic devices. They carry out most of the functionalities of desktops, offering various useful applications that suit the user’s needs. Therefore, instead of the operator, the user has been the main controller of the device and its applications, therefore its reliability has become an emergent requirement. As a first step, based on collected smartphone applications failure data, we investigated and evaluated the efficacy of Software Reliability Growth Models (SRGMs) when applied to these smartphone data in order to check whether they achieve the same accuracy as in the desktop/laptop area. None of the selected models were able to account for the smartphone data satisfactorily. Their failure is traced back to: (i) the hardware and software differences between desktops and smartphones, (ii) the specific features of mobile applications compared to desktop applications, and (iii) the different operational conditions and usage profiles. Thus, a reliability model suited to smartphone applications is still needed. In the second step, we applied the Weibull and Gamma distributions, and their two particular cases, Rayleigh and S-Shaped, to model the smartphone failure data sorted by application version number and grouped into different time periods. An estimation of the expected number of defects in each application version was obtained. The performances of the distributions were then compared amongst each other. We found that both Weibull and Gamma distributions can fit the failure data of mobile applications, although the Gamma distribution is frequently more suited

Reliability Models Applied to Smartphone Applications

Smartphones have become the most used electronic devices. They carry out most of the functionalities of desktops, offering various useful applications that suit the user’s needs. Therefore, instead of the operator, the user has been the main controller of the device and its applications, therefore its reliability has become an emergent requirement. As a first step, based on collected smartphone applications failure data, we investigated and evaluated the efficacy of Software Reliability Growth Models (SRGMs) when applied to these smartphone data in order to check whether they achieve the same accuracy as in the desktop/laptop area. None of the selected models were able to account for the smartphone data satisfactorily. Their failure is traced back to: (i) the hardware and software differences between desktops and smartphones, (ii) the specific features of mobile applications compared to desktop applications, and (iii) the different operational conditions and usage profiles. Thus, a reliability model suited to smartphone applications is still needed. In the second step, we applied the Weibull and Gamma distributions, and their two particular cases, Rayleigh and S-Shaped, to model the smartphone failure data sorted by application version number and grouped into different time periods. An estimation of the expected number of defects in each application version was obtained. The performances of the distributions were then compared amongst each other. We found that both Weibull and Gamma distributions can fit the failure data of mobile applications, although the Gamma distribution is frequently more suited