2,444 research outputs found
A New General Method to Generate Random Modal Formulae for Testing Decision Procedures
The recent emergence of heavily-optimized modal decision procedures has highlighted the key role of empirical testing in this domain. Unfortunately, the introduction of extensive empirical tests for modal logics is recent, and so far none of the proposed test generators is very satisfactory. To cope with this fact, we present a new random generation method that provides benefits over previous methods for generating empirical tests. It fixes and much generalizes one of the best-known methods, the random CNF_[]m test, allowing for generating a much wider variety of problems, covering in principle the whole input space. Our new method produces much more suitable test sets for the current generation of modal decision procedures. We analyze the features of the new method by means of an extensive collection of empirical tests
A New General Method to Generate Random Modal Formulae for Testing Decision Procedures
The recent emergence of heavily-optimized modal decision procedures has
highlighted the key role of empirical testing in this domain. Unfortunately,
the introduction of extensive empirical tests for modal logics is recent, and
so far none of the proposed test generators is very satisfactory. To cope with
this fact, we present a new random generation method that provides benefits
over previous methods for generating empirical tests. It fixes and much
generalizes one of the best-known methods, the random CNF_[]m test, allowing
for generating a much wider variety of problems, covering in principle the
whole input space. Our new method produces much more suitable test sets for the
current generation of modal decision procedures. We analyze the features of the
new method by means of an extensive collection of empirical tests
Simple Decision Procedure for S5 in Standard Cut-Free Sequent Calculus
In the paper a decision procedure for S5 is presented which uses a cut-free sequent calculus with additional rules allowing a reduction to normal modal forms. It utilizes the fact that in S5 every formula is equivalent to some 1-degree formula, i.e. a modally-flat formula with modal functors having only boolean formulas in its scope. In contrast to many sequent calculi (SC) for S5 the presented system does not introduce any extra devices. Thus it is a standard version of SC but with some additional simple rewrite rules. The procedure combines the proces of saturation of sequents with reduction of their elements to some normal modal form
PSPACE Reasoning for Graded Modal Logics
We present a PSPACE algorithm that decides satisfiability of the graded modal
logic Gr(K_R)---a natural extension of propositional modal logic K_R by
counting expressions---which plays an important role in the area of knowledge
representation. The algorithm employs a tableaux approach and is the first
known algorithm which meets the lower bound for the complexity of the problem.
Thus, we exactly fix the complexity of the problem and refute an
ExpTime-hardness conjecture. We extend the results to the logic Gr(K_(R \cap
I)), which augments Gr(K_R) with inverse relations and intersection of
accessibility relations. This establishes a kind of ``theoretical benchmark''
that all algorithmic approaches can be measured against
On Sub-Propositional Fragments of Modal Logic
In this paper, we consider the well-known modal logics ,
, , and , and we study some of their
sub-propositional fragments, namely the classical Horn fragment, the Krom
fragment, the so-called core fragment, defined as the intersection of the Horn
and the Krom fragments, plus their sub-fragments obtained by limiting the use
of boxes and diamonds in clauses. We focus, first, on the relative expressive
power of such languages: we introduce a suitable measure of expressive power,
and we obtain a complex hierarchy that encompasses all fragments of the
considered logics. Then, after observing the low expressive power, in
particular, of the Horn fragments without diamonds, we study the computational
complexity of their satisfiability problem, proving that, in general, it
becomes polynomial
Logics for modelling collective attitudes
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional
attitudes that are defined by means of the majority rule. It is well known that majoritarian
aggregation is subject to irrationality, as the results in social choice theory and judgment
aggregation show. The proposed logics for modelling collective attitudes are based on
a substructural propositional logic that allows for circumventing inconsistent outcomes.
Individual and collective propositional attitudes, such as beliefs, desires, obligations, are
then modelled by means of minimal modalities to ensure a number of basic principles. In
this way, a viable consistent modelling of collective attitudes is obtained
- …