36,631 research outputs found

    Degree Sequence Index Strategy

    Full text link
    We introduce a procedure, called the Degree Sequence Index Strategy (DSI), by which to bound graph invariants by certain indices in the ordered degree sequence. As an illustration of the DSI strategy, we show how it can be used to give new upper and lower bounds on the kk-independence and the kk-domination numbers. These include, among other things, a double generalization of the annihilation number, a recently introduced upper bound on the independence number. Next, we use the DSI strategy in conjunction with planarity, to generalize some results of Caro and Roddity about independence number in planar graphs. Lastly, for claw-free and K1,rK_{1,r}-free graphs, we use DSI to generalize some results of Faudree, Gould, Jacobson, Lesniak and Lindquester

    Sum-of-squares lower bounds for planted clique

    Full text link
    Finding cliques in random graphs and the closely related "planted" clique variant, where a clique of size k is planted in a random G(n, 1/2) graph, have been the focus of substantial study in algorithm design. Despite much effort, the best known polynomial-time algorithms only solve the problem for k ~ sqrt(n). In this paper we study the complexity of the planted clique problem under algorithms from the Sum-of-squares hierarchy. We prove the first average case lower bound for this model: for almost all graphs in G(n,1/2), r rounds of the SOS hierarchy cannot find a planted k-clique unless k > n^{1/2r} (up to logarithmic factors). Thus, for any constant number of rounds planted cliques of size n^{o(1)} cannot be found by this powerful class of algorithms. This is shown via an integrability gap for the natural formulation of maximum clique problem on random graphs for SOS and Lasserre hierarchies, which in turn follow from degree lower bounds for the Positivestellensatz proof system. We follow the usual recipe for such proofs. First, we introduce a natural "dual certificate" (also known as a "vector-solution" or "pseudo-expectation") for the given system of polynomial equations representing the problem for every fixed input graph. Then we show that the matrix associated with this dual certificate is PSD (positive semi-definite) with high probability over the choice of the input graph.This requires the use of certain tools. One is the theory of association schemes, and in particular the eigenspaces and eigenvalues of the Johnson scheme. Another is a combinatorial method we develop to compute (via traces) norm bounds for certain random matrices whose entries are highly dependent; we hope this method will be useful elsewhere

    Upper tails and independence polynomials in random graphs

    Full text link
    The upper tail problem in the Erd\H{o}s--R\'enyi random graph GGn,pG\sim\mathcal{G}_{n,p} asks to estimate the probability that the number of copies of a graph HH in GG exceeds its expectation by a factor 1+δ1+\delta. Chatterjee and Dembo showed that in the sparse regime of p0p\to 0 as nn\to\infty with pnαp \geq n^{-\alpha} for an explicit α=αH>0\alpha=\alpha_H>0, this problem reduces to a natural variational problem on weighted graphs, which was thereafter asymptotically solved by two of the authors in the case where HH is a clique. Here we extend the latter work to any fixed graph HH and determine a function cH(δ)c_H(\delta) such that, for pp as above and any fixed δ>0\delta>0, the upper tail probability is exp[(cH(δ)+o(1))n2pΔlog(1/p)]\exp[-(c_H(\delta)+o(1))n^2 p^\Delta \log(1/p)], where Δ\Delta is the maximum degree of HH. As it turns out, the leading order constant in the large deviation rate function, cH(δ)c_H(\delta), is governed by the independence polynomial of HH, defined as PH(x)=iH(k)xkP_H(x)=\sum i_H(k) x^k where iH(k)i_H(k) is the number of independent sets of size kk in HH. For instance, if HH is a regular graph on mm vertices, then cH(δ)c_H(\delta) is the minimum between 12δ2/m\frac12 \delta^{2/m} and the unique positive solution of PH(x)=1+δP_H(x) = 1+\delta
    corecore