2,773 research outputs found
Evolutionary Tournament-Based Comparison of Learning and Non-Learning Algorithms for Iterated Games
Evolutionary tournaments have been used effectively as a tool for comparing game-playing algorithms. For instance, in the late 1970's, Axelrod organized tournaments to compare algorithms for playing the iterated prisoner's dilemma (PD) game. These tournaments capture the dynamics in a population of agents that periodically adopt relatively successful algorithms in the environment. While these tournaments have provided us with a better understanding of the relative merits of algorithms for iterated PD, our understanding is less clear about algorithms for playing iterated versions of arbitrary single-stage games in an environment of heterogeneous agents. While the Nash equilibrium solution concept has been used to recommend using Nash equilibrium strategies for rational players playing general-sum games, learning algorithms like fictitious play may be preferred for playing against sub-rational players. In this paper, we study the relative performance of learning and non-learning algorithms in an evolutionary tournament where agents periodically adopt relatively successful algorithms in the population. The tournament is played over a testbed composed of all possible structurally distinct 2×2 conflicted games with ordinal payoffs: a baseline, neutral testbed for comparing algorithms. Before analyzing results from the evolutionary tournament, we discuss the testbed, our choice of representative learning and non-learning algorithms and relative rankings of these algorithms in a round-robin competition. The results from the tournament highlight the advantage of learning algorithms over players using static equilibrium strategies for repeated plays of arbitrary single-stage games. The results are likely to be of more benefit compared to work on static analysis of equilibrium strategies for choosing decision procedures for open, adapting agent society consisting of a variety of competitors.Repeated Games, Evolution, Simulation
Learning with Opponent-Learning Awareness
Multi-agent settings are quickly gathering importance in machine learning.
This includes a plethora of recent work on deep multi-agent reinforcement
learning, but also can be extended to hierarchical RL, generative adversarial
networks and decentralised optimisation. In all these settings the presence of
multiple learning agents renders the training problem non-stationary and often
leads to unstable training or undesired final results. We present Learning with
Opponent-Learning Awareness (LOLA), a method in which each agent shapes the
anticipated learning of the other agents in the environment. The LOLA learning
rule includes a term that accounts for the impact of one agent's policy on the
anticipated parameter update of the other agents. Results show that the
encounter of two LOLA agents leads to the emergence of tit-for-tat and
therefore cooperation in the iterated prisoners' dilemma, while independent
learning does not. In this domain, LOLA also receives higher payouts compared
to a naive learner, and is robust against exploitation by higher order
gradient-based methods. Applied to repeated matching pennies, LOLA agents
converge to the Nash equilibrium. In a round robin tournament we show that LOLA
agents successfully shape the learning of a range of multi-agent learning
algorithms from literature, resulting in the highest average returns on the
IPD. We also show that the LOLA update rule can be efficiently calculated using
an extension of the policy gradient estimator, making the method suitable for
model-free RL. The method thus scales to large parameter and input spaces and
nonlinear function approximators. We apply LOLA to a grid world task with an
embedded social dilemma using recurrent policies and opponent modelling. By
explicitly considering the learning of the other agent, LOLA agents learn to
cooperate out of self-interest. The code is at github.com/alshedivat/lola
Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Swarm Systems
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) has become a useful tool for learning
behavioral models from demonstration data. However, IRL remains mostly
unexplored for multi-agent systems. In this paper, we show how the principle of
IRL can be extended to homogeneous large-scale problems, inspired by the
collective swarming behavior of natural systems. In particular, we make the
following contributions to the field: 1) We introduce the swarMDP framework, a
sub-class of decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes
endowed with a swarm characterization. 2) Exploiting the inherent homogeneity
of this framework, we reduce the resulting multi-agent IRL problem to a
single-agent one by proving that the agent-specific value functions in this
model coincide. 3) To solve the corresponding control problem, we propose a
novel heterogeneous learning scheme that is particularly tailored to the swarm
setting. Results on two example systems demonstrate that our framework is able
to produce meaningful local reward models from which we can replicate the
observed global system dynamics.Comment: 9 pages, 8 figures; ### Version 2 ### version accepted at AAMAS 201
- …