665 research outputs found
On Automated Lemma Generation for Separation Logic with Inductive Definitions
Separation Logic with inductive definitions is a well-known approach for
deductive verification of programs that manipulate dynamic data structures.
Deciding verification conditions in this context is usually based on
user-provided lemmas relating the inductive definitions. We propose a novel
approach for generating these lemmas automatically which is based on simple
syntactic criteria and deterministic strategies for applying them. Our approach
focuses on iterative programs, although it can be applied to recursive programs
as well, and specifications that describe not only the shape of the data
structures, but also their content or their size. Empirically, we find that our
approach is powerful enough to deal with sophisticated benchmarks, e.g.,
iterative procedures for searching, inserting, or deleting elements in sorted
lists, binary search tress, red-black trees, and AVL trees, in a very efficient
way
Extending ACL2 with SMT Solvers
We present our extension of ACL2 with Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT)
solvers using ACL2's trusted clause processor mechanism. We are particularly
interested in the verification of physical systems including Analog and
Mixed-Signal (AMS) designs. ACL2 offers strong induction abilities for
reasoning about sequences and SMT complements deduction methods like ACL2 with
fast nonlinear arithmetic solving procedures. While SAT solvers have been
integrated into ACL2 in previous work, SMT methods raise new issues because of
their support for a broader range of domains including real numbers and
uninterpreted functions. This paper presents Smtlink, our clause processor for
integrating SMT solvers into ACL2. We describe key design and implementation
issues and describe our experience with its use.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2015, arXiv:1509.0552
The Dafny Integrated Development Environment
In recent years, program verifiers and interactive theorem provers have
become more powerful and more suitable for verifying large programs or proofs.
This has demonstrated the need for improving the user experience of these tools
to increase productivity and to make them more accessible to non-experts. This
paper presents an integrated development environment for Dafny-a programming
language, verifier, and proof assistant-that addresses issues present in most
state-of-the-art verifiers: low responsiveness and lack of support for
understanding non-obvious verification failures. The paper demonstrates several
new features that move the state-of-the-art closer towards a verification
environment that can provide verification feedback as the user types and can
present more helpful information about the program or failed verifications in a
demand-driven and unobtrusive way.Comment: In Proceedings F-IDE 2014, arXiv:1404.578
Removing Algebraic Data Types from Constrained Horn Clauses Using Difference Predicates
We address the problem of proving the satisfiability of Constrained Horn
Clauses (CHCs) with Algebraic Data Types (ADTs), such as lists and trees. We
propose a new technique for transforming CHCs with ADTs into CHCs where
predicates are defined over basic types, such as integers and booleans, only.
Thus, our technique avoids the explicit use of inductive proof rules during
satisfiability proofs. The main extension over previous techniques for ADT
removal is a new transformation rule, called differential replacement, which
allows us to introduce auxiliary predicates corresponding to the lemmas that
are often needed when making inductive proofs. We present an algorithm that
uses the new rule, together with the traditional folding/unfolding
transformation rules, for the automatic removal of ADTs. We prove that if the
set of the transformed clauses is satisfiable, then so is the set of the
original clauses. By an experimental evaluation, we show that the use of the
differential replacement rule significantly improves the effectiveness of ADT
removal, and we show that our transformation-based approach is competitive with
respect to a well-established technique that extends the CVC4 solver with
induction.Comment: 10th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR
2020) - version with appendix; added DOI of the final authenticated Springer
publication; minor correction
Computer Science and Metaphysics: A Cross-Fertilization
Computational philosophy is the use of mechanized computational techniques to
unearth philosophical insights that are either difficult or impossible to find
using traditional philosophical methods. Computational metaphysics is
computational philosophy with a focus on metaphysics. In this paper, we (a)
develop results in modal metaphysics whose discovery was computer assisted, and
(b) conclude that these results work not only to the obvious benefit of
philosophy but also, less obviously, to the benefit of computer science, since
the new computational techniques that led to these results may be more broadly
applicable within computer science. The paper includes a description of our
background methodology and how it evolved, and a discussion of our new results.Comment: 39 pages, 3 figure
Tip: Tools for inductive provers
TIP is a toolbox for users and developers of inductive provers. It consists of a large number of tools which can, for example, simplify an inductive problem, monomorphise it or find counterexamples to it. We are using TIP to help maintain a set of benchmarks for inductive theorem provers, where its main job is to encode aspects of the problem that are not natively supported by the respective provers. TIP makes it easier to write inductive provers, by supplying necessary tools such as lemma discovery which prover authors can simply import into their own prover
- …