A Survey of Paraphrasing and Textual Entailment Methods

Paraphrasing methods recognize, generate, or extract phrases, sentences, or longer natural language expressions that convey almost the same information. Textual entailment methods, on the other hand, recognize, generate, or extract pairs of natural language expressions, such that a human who reads (and trusts) the first element of a pair would most likely infer that the other element is also true. Paraphrasing can be seen as bidirectional textual entailment and methods from the two areas are often similar. Both kinds of methods are useful, at least in principle, in a wide range of natural language processing applications, including question answering, summarization, text generation, and machine translation. We summarize key ideas from the two areas by considering in turn recognition, generation, and extraction methods, also pointing to prominent articles and resources.Comment: Technical Report, Natural Language Processing Group, Department of Informatics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece, 201

Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation

This paper surveys the current state of the art in Natural Language Generation (NLG), defined as the task of generating text or speech from non-linguistic input. A survey of NLG is timely in view of the changes that the field has undergone over the past decade or so, especially in relation to new (usually data-driven) methods, as well as new applications of NLG technology. This survey therefore aims to (a) give an up-to-date synthesis of research on the core tasks in NLG and the architectures adopted in which such tasks are organised; (b) highlight a number of relatively recent research topics that have arisen partly as a result of growing synergies between NLG and other areas of artificial intelligence; (c) draw attention to the challenges in NLG evaluation, relating them to similar challenges faced in other areas of Natural Language Processing, with an emphasis on different evaluation methods and the relationships between them.Comment: Published in Journal of AI Research (JAIR), volume 61, pp 75-170. 118 pages, 8 figures, 1 tabl

Final FLaReNet deliverable: Language Resources for the Future - The Future of Language Resources

Language Technologies (LT), together with their backbone, Language Resources (LR), provide an essential support to the challenge of Multilingualism and ICT of the future. The main task of language technologies is to bridge language barriers and to help creating a new environment where information flows smoothly across frontiers and languages, no matter the country, and the language, of origin. To achieve this goal, all players involved need to act as a community able to join forces on a set of shared priorities. However, until now the field of Language Resources and Technology has long suffered from an excess of individuality and fragmentation, with a lack of coherence concerning the priorities for the field, the direction to move, not to mention a common timeframe. The context encountered by the FLaReNet project was thus represented by an active field needing a coherence that can only be given by sharing common priorities and endeavours. FLaReNet has contributed to the creation of this coherence by gathering a wide community of experts and making them participate in the definition of an exhaustive set of recommendations

Speech Recognition

Chapters in the first part of the book cover all the essential speech processing techniques for building robust, automatic speech recognition systems: the representation for speech signals and the methods for speech-features extraction, acoustic and language modeling, efficient algorithms for searching the hypothesis space, and multimodal approaches to speech recognition. The last part of the book is devoted to other speech processing applications that can use the information from automatic speech recognition for speaker identification and tracking, for prosody modeling in emotion-detection systems and in other speech processing applications that are able to operate in real-world environments, like mobile communication services and smart homes

The application of manifold based visual speech units for visual speech recognition

This dissertation presents a new learning-based representation that is referred to as a Visual Speech Unit for visual speech recognition (VSR). The automated recognition of human speech using only features from the visual domain has become a significant research topic that plays an essential role in the development of many multimedia systems such as audio visual speech recognition(AVSR), mobile phone applications, human-computer interaction (HCI) and sign language recognition. The inclusion of the lip visual information is opportune since it can improve the overall accuracy of audio or hand recognition algorithms especially when such systems are operated in environments characterized by a high level of acoustic noise. The main contribution of the work presented in this thesis is located in the development of a new learning-based representation that is referred to as Visual Speech Unit for Visual Speech Recognition (VSR). The main components of the developed Visual Speech Recognition system are applied to: (a) segment the mouth region of interest, (b) extract the visual features from the real time input video image and (c) to identify the visual speech units. The major difficulty associated with the VSR systems resides in the identification of the smallest elements contained in the image sequences that represent the lip movements in the visual domain. The Visual Speech Unit concept as proposed represents an extension of the standard viseme model that is currently applied for VSR. The VSU model augments the standard viseme approach by including in this new representation not only the data associated with the articulation of the visemes but also the transitory information between consecutive visemes. A large section of this thesis has been dedicated to analysis the performance of the new visual speech unit model when compared with that attained for standard (MPEG- 4) viseme models. Two experimental results indicate that: 1. The developed VSR system achieved 80-90% correct recognition when the system has been applied to the identification of 60 classes of VSUs, while the recognition rate for the standard set of MPEG-4 visemes was only 62-72%. 2. 15 words are identified when VSU and viseme are employed as the visual speech element. The accuracy rate for word recognition based on VSUs is 7%-12% higher than the accuracy rate based on visemes