Landmark detection in 2D bioimages for geometric morphometrics: a multi-resolution tree-based approach

The detection of anatomical landmarks in bioimages is a necessary but tedious step for geometric morphometrics studies in many research domains. We propose variants of a multi-resolution tree-based approach to speed-up the detection of landmarks in bioimages. We extensively evaluate our method variants on three different datasets (cephalometric, zebrafish, and drosophila images). We identify the key method parameters (notably the multi-resolution) and report results with respect to human ground truths and existing methods. Our method achieves recognition performances competitive with current existing approaches while being generic and fast. The algorithms are integrated in the open-source Cytomine software and we provide parameter configuration guidelines so that they can be easily exploited by end-users. Finally, datasets are readily available through a Cytomine server to foster future research

CEPHA29: Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection Challenge 2023

Quantitative cephalometric analysis is the most widely used clinical and research tool in modern orthodontics. Accurate localization of cephalometric landmarks enables the quantification and classification of anatomical abnormalities, however, the traditional manual way of marking these landmarks is a very tedious job. Endeavours have constantly been made to develop automated cephalometric landmark detection systems but they are inadequate for orthodontic applications. The fundamental reason for this is that the amount of publicly available datasets as well as the images provided for training in these datasets are insufficient for an AI model to perform well. To facilitate the development of robust AI solutions for morphometric analysis, we organise the CEPHA29 Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection Challenge in conjunction with IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2023). In this context, we provide the largest known publicly available dataset, consisting of 1000 cephalometric X-ray images. We hope that our challenge will not only derive forward research and innovation in automatic cephalometric landmark identification but will also signal the beginning of a new era in the discipline

Automatic Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Annotation System Using Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis using computerized tomography data has been rapidly adopted for dysmorphosis and anthropometry. Several different approaches to automatic 3D annotation have been proposed to overcome the limitations of traditional cephalometry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of our newly-developed system using a deep learning algorithm for automatic 3D cephalometric annotation. Methods: To overcome current technical limitations, some measures were developed to directly annotate 3D human skull data. Our deep learning-based model system mainly consisted of a 3D convolutional neural network and image data resampling. Results: The discrepancies between the referenced and predicted coordinate values in three axes and in 3D distance were calculated to evaluate system accuracy. Our new model system yielded prediction errors of 3.26, 3.18, and 4.81 mm (for three axes) and 7.61 mm (for 3D). Moreover, there was no difference among the landmarks of the three groups, including the midsagittal plane, horizontal plane, and mandible (p>0.05). Conclusion: A new 3D convolutional neural network-based automatic annotation system for 3D cephalometry was developed. The strategies used to implement the system were detailed and measurement results were evaluated for accuracy. Further development of this system is planned for full clinical application of automatic 3D cephalometric annotation

The reliability of cephalometric tracing using AI

Introduction : L'objectif de cette étude est de comparer la différence entre l'analyse céphalométrique manuelle et l'analyse automatisée par l’intelligence artificielle afin de confirmer la fiabilité de cette dernière. Notre hypothèse de recherche est que la technique manuelle est la plus fiable des deux méthodes. Méthode : Un total de 99 radiographies céphalométriques latérales sont recueillies. Des tracés par technique manuelle (MT) et par localisation automatisée par intelligence artificielle (AI) sont réalisés pour toutes les radiographies. La localisation de 29 points céphalométriques couramment utilisés est comparée entre les deux groupes. L'erreur radiale moyenne (MRE) et un taux de détection réussie (SDR) de 2 mm sont utilisés pour comparer les deux groupes. Le logiciel AudaxCeph version 6.2.57.4225 est utilisé pour l'analyse manuelle et l'analyse AI. Résultats : Le MRE et SDR pour le test de fiabilité inter-examinateur sont respectivement de 0,87 ± 0,61mm et 95%. Pour la comparaison entre la technique manuelle MT et le repérage par intelligence artificielle AI, le MRE et SDR pour tous les repères sont respectivement de 1,48 ± 1,42 mm et 78 %. Lorsque les repères dentaires sont exclus, le MRE diminue à 1,33 ± 1,39 mm et le SDR augmente à 84 %. Lorsque seuls les repères des tissus durs sont inclus (excluant les points des tissus mous et dentaires), le MRE diminue encore à 1,25 ± 1,09 mm et le SDR augmente à 85 %. Lorsque seuls les points de repère des tissus mous sont inclus, le MRE augmente à 1,68 ± 1,89 mm et le SDR diminue à 78 %. Conclusion: La performance du logiciel est similaire à celles précédemment rapportée dans la littérature pour des logiciels utilisant un cadre de modélisation similaire. Nos résultats révèlent que le repérage manuel a donné lieu à une plus grande précision. Le logiciel a obtenu de très bons résultats pour les points de tissus durs, mais sa précision a diminué pour les tissus mous et dentaires. Nous concluons que cette technologie est très prometteuse pour une application en milieu clinique sous la supervision du docteur.Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the difference between manual cephalometric analysis and automatic analysis by artificial intelligence to confirm the reliability of the latter. Our research hypothesis is that the manual technique is the most reliable of the methods and is still considered the gold standard. Method: A total of 99 lateral cephalometric radiographs were collected in this study. Manual technique (MT) and automatic localization by artificial intelligence (AI) tracings were performed for all radiographs. The localization of 29 commonly used landmarks were compared between both groups. Mean radial error (MRE) and a successful detection rate (SDR) of 2mm were used to compare both groups. AudaxCeph software version 6.2.57.4225 (Audax d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used for both manual and AI analysis. Results: The MRE and SDR for the inter-examinator reliability test were 0.87 ± 0.61mm and 95% respectively. For the comparison between the manual technique MT and landmarking with artificial intelligence AI, the MRE and SDR for all landmarks were 1.48 ± 1.42mm and 78% respectively. When dental landmarks are excluded, the MRE decreases to 1.33 ± 1.39mm and the SDR increases to 84%. When only hard tissue landmarks are included (excluding soft tissue and dental points) the MRE decreases further to 1.25 ± 1.09mm and the SDR increases to 85%. When only soft tissue landmarks are included the MRE increases to 1.68 ± 1.89mm and the SDR decreases to 78%. Conclusion: The software performed similarly to what was previously reported in literature for software that use analogous modeling framework. Comparing the software’s landmarking to manual landmarking our results reveal that the manual landmarking resulted in higher accuracy. The software operated very well for hard tissue points, but its accuracy went down for soft and dental tissue. Our conclusion is this technology shows great promise for application in clinical settings under the doctor’s supervision

Deep Learning-Based Regression and Classification for Automatic Landmark Localization in Medical Images

In this study, we propose a fast and accurate method to automatically localize anatomical landmarks in medical images. We employ a global-to-local localization approach using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs). First, a global FCNN localizes multiple landmarks through the analysis of image patches, performing regression and classification simultaneously. In regression, displacement vectors pointing from the center of image patches towards landmark locations are determined. In classification, presence of landmarks of interest in the patch is established. Global landmark locations are obtained by averaging the predicted displacement vectors, where the contribution of each displacement vector is weighted by the posterior classification probability of the patch that it is pointing from. Subsequently, for each landmark localized with global localization, local analysis is performed. Specialized FCNNs refine the global landmark locations by analyzing local sub-images in a similar manner, i.e. by performing regression and classification simultaneously and combining the results. Evaluation was performed through localization of 8 anatomical landmarks in CCTA scans, 2 landmarks in olfactory MR scans, and 19 landmarks in cephalometric X-rays. We demonstrate that the method performs similarly to a second observer and is able to localize landmarks in a diverse set of medical images, differing in image modality, image dimensionality, and anatomical coverage.Comment: 12 pages, accepted at IEEE transactions in Medical Imagin

An Approach for Efficient Detection of Cephalometric Landmarks

AbstractIn this paper, a method is developed for the automated identification of cephalometric landmarks in orthodontics. The process of soft tissue edge detection is divided into two steps: detecting the sub-images that contained the required landmarks using combination of the Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG) descriptor with the Support Vector Machine (SVM), then utilizing Thresholding and Mathematical Morphological (TMM) algorithm to trace soft tissue profile. In addition, the mandible's edge is detected by the Active contours without edges (Chan-Vese method). Finally, the landmarks of soft tissue profile and the mandible's edge are pinned based on analyzing the contour plot of these lines. The simulation results have high accuracy

Morphological evaluation of head in Turkman males in Gorgan-North of Iran

Cephalometry or measurement of human head is used in identification, forensic medicine, plastic surgery, orthodontics, archeology and examine the differences between races and ethnicities. This descriptive investigation was undertaken on 198 young Turkman males to determine the cephalic index and head phenotype among them in Gorgan, North of Iran. In this study cephalic index was determined by classic cephalometric method. Mean and standard deviation of cephalic index was 80.4 ± 4. Based on the cephalic index, the head shape of 42.4% of individuals were brachycephalic, 7.6% hyperbrachycephalic, 40.9% mesocephalic and 8.1% dolicocephalic. This research showed that Turkman individuals have typical brachycephalic phenotype. In comparison to other studies, we can conclude that the ethnic factor has an effective role on head phenotype in North of Iran

Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the accuracy of automated landmarking using deep learning in comparison with manual tracing for cephalometric analysis of 3D medical images. Methods PubMed/Medline, IEEE Xplore, Scopus and ArXiv electronic databases were searched. Selection criteria were: ex vivo and in vivo volumetric data images suitable for 3D landmarking (Problem), a minimum of five automated landmarking performed by deep learning method (Intervention), manual landmarking (Comparison), and mean accuracy, in mm, between manual and automated landmarking (Outcome). QUADAS-2 was adapted for quality analysis. Meta-analysis was performed on studies that reported as outcome mean values and standard deviation of the difference (error) between manual and automated landmarking. Linear regression plots were used to analyze correlations between mean accuracy and year of publication. Results The initial electronic screening yielded 252 papers published between 2020 and 2022. A total of 15 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis, whereas 11 studies were used for the meta-analysis. Overall random effect model revealed a mean value of 2.44 mm, with a high heterogeneity (I-2 = 98.13%, tau(2) = 1.018, p-value < 0.001); risk of bias was high due to the presence of issues for several domains per study. Meta-regression indicated a significant relation between mean error and year of publication (p value = 0.012). Conclusion Deep learning algorithms showed an excellent accuracy for automated 3D cephalometric landmarking. In the last two years promising algorithms have been developed and improvements in landmarks annotation accuracy have been done