Asynchronous Early Output Section-Carry Based Carry Lookahead Adder with Alias Carry Logic

A new asynchronous early output section-carry based carry lookahead adder (SCBCLA) with alias carry output logic is presented in this paper. To evaluate the proposed SCBCLA with alias carry logic and to make a comparison with other CLAs, a 32-bit addition operation is considered. Compared to the weak-indication SCBCLA with alias logic, the proposed early output SCBCLA with alias logic reports a 13% reduction in area without any increases in latency and power dissipation. On the other hand, in comparison with the early output recursive CLA (RCLA), the proposed early output SCBCLA with alias logic reports a 16% reduction in latency while occupying almost the same area and dissipating almost the same average power. All the asynchronous CLAs are quasi-delay-insensitive designs which incorporate the delay-insensitive dual-rail data encoding and adhere to the 4-phase return-to-zero handshaking. The adders were realized and the simulations were performed based on a 32/28nm CMOS process

Asynchronous Early Output Block Carry Lookahead Adder with Improved Quality of Results

A new asynchronous early output block carry lookahead adder (BCLA) incorporating redundant carries is proposed. Compared to the best of existing semi-custom asynchronous carry lookahead adders (CLAs) employing delay-insensitive data encoding and following a 4-phase handshaking, the proposed BCLA with redundant carries achieves 13% reduction in forward latency and 14.8% reduction in cycle time compared to the best of the existing CLAs featuring redundant carries with no area or power penalty. A hybrid variant involving a ripple carry adder (RCA) in the least significant stages i.e. BCLA-RCA is also considered that achieves a further 4% reduction in the forward latency and a 2.4% reduction in the cycle time compared to the proposed BCLA featuring redundant carries without area or power penalties

Critique of "Asynchronous Logic Implementation Based on Factorized DIMS"

This paper comments on "Asynchronous Logic Implementation Based on Factorized DIMS" [Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers, vol. 26, no. 5, 1750087: 1-9, May 2017] with respect to two main problematic issues: i) the gate orphan problem implicit in the factorized DIMS approach discussed in the referenced article which affects its strong-indication, and ii) how the enumeration of product terms to represent the synthesis cost is skewed in the referenced article because the logic expression contains sum of products and also product of sums. It is observed that the referenced article has not provided a general logic synthesis algorithm excepting only an example illustration involving a 3-input AND logic function. The absence of a general logic synthesis algorithm would make it difficult to reproduce the research described in the referenced article. Moreover, the example illustration in the referenced article describes an unsafe logic decomposition which is not suitable for the multi-level synthesis of strong-indication asynchronous circuits. Further, a logic synthesis method which safely decomposes the DIMS solution to synthesize multi-level strong-indication asynchronous circuits is available in the existing literature, which was neither cited nor taken up for comparison in the referenced article, which is another drawback. Subsequently, it is concluded that the referenced article has not advanced existing knowledge in the field but on the contrary, has caused confusions. Hence, in the interest of readers, this paper additionally highlights some important and relevant literature which provide valuable information about robust asynchronous circuit synthesis techniques which employ delay-insensitive codes for data representation and processing and the 4-phase return-to-zero handshake protocol for data communication.Comment: 15 page

Performance Comparison of Quasi-Delay-Insensitive Asynchronous Adders

In this technical note, we provide a comparison of the design metrics of various quasi-delay-insensitive (QDI) asynchronous adders, where the adders correspond to diverse architectures. QDI adders are robust, and the objective of this technical note is to point to those QDI adders which are suitable for low power/energy and less area. This information could be valuable for a resource-constrained low power VLSI design scenario. Non-QDI adders are excluded from the comparison since they are not robust although they may have optimized design metrics. All the QDI adders were realized using a 32/28nm CMOS process.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1903.0943

Speed and Energy Optimised Quasi-Delay-Insensitive Block Carry Lookahead Adder

We present a new asynchronous quasi-delay-insensitive (QDI) block carry lookahead adder with redundancy carry (BCLARC) realized using delay-insensitive dual-rail data encoding and 4-phase return-to-zero (RTZ) and 4-phase return-to-one (RTO) handshaking. The proposed QDI BCLARC is found to be faster and energy-efficient than the existing asynchronous adders which are QDI and non-QDI (i.e., relative-timed). Compared to existing asynchronous adders corresponding to various architectures such as ripple carry adder (RCA), conventional carry lookahead adder (CCLA), carry select adder (CSLA), BCLARC, and hybrid BCLARC-RCA, the proposed BCLARC is found to be faster and more energy-optimised. The cycle time (CT), which is the sum of forward and reverse latencies, governs the speed; and the product of average power dissipation and cycle time viz. the power-cycle time product (PCTP) defines the low power/energy efficiency. For a 32-bit addition, the proposed QDI BCLARC achieves the following average reductions in design metrics over its counterparts when considering RTZ and RTO handshaking: i) 20.5% and 19.6% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum QDI early output RCA, ii) 16.5% and 15.8% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum relative-timed RCA, iii) 32.9% and 35.9% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum uniform input-partitioned QDI early output CSLA, iv) 47.5% and 47.2% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum QDI early output CCLA, v) 14.2% and 27.3% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum QDI early output BCLARC, and vi) 12.2% and 11.6% reductions in CT and PCTP respectively compared to an optimum QDI early output hybrid BCLARC-RCA. The adders were implemented using a 32/28nm CMOS technology.Comment: PLOS ONE Preprint versio