3,066 research outputs found
Tight polynomial worst-case bounds for loop programs
In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language - representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid
Algorithmic Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Termination Problems for Affine Probabilistic Programs
In this paper, we consider termination of probabilistic programs with
real-valued variables. The questions concerned are:
1. qualitative ones that ask (i) whether the program terminates with
probability 1 (almost-sure termination) and (ii) whether the expected
termination time is finite (finite termination); 2. quantitative ones that ask
(i) to approximate the expected termination time (expectation problem) and (ii)
to compute a bound B such that the probability to terminate after B steps
decreases exponentially (concentration problem).
To solve these questions, we utilize the notion of ranking supermartingales
which is a powerful approach for proving termination of probabilistic programs.
In detail, we focus on algorithmic synthesis of linear ranking-supermartingales
over affine probabilistic programs (APP's) with both angelic and demonic
non-determinism. An important subclass of APP's is LRAPP which is defined as
the class of all APP's over which a linear ranking-supermartingale exists.
Our main contributions are as follows. Firstly, we show that the membership
problem of LRAPP (i) can be decided in polynomial time for APP's with at most
demonic non-determinism, and (ii) is NP-hard and in PSPACE for APP's with
angelic non-determinism; moreover, the NP-hardness result holds already for
APP's without probability and demonic non-determinism. Secondly, we show that
the concentration problem over LRAPP can be solved in the same complexity as
for the membership problem of LRAPP. Finally, we show that the expectation
problem over LRAPP can be solved in 2EXPTIME and is PSPACE-hard even for APP's
without probability and non-determinism (i.e., deterministic programs). Our
experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to answer
the qualitative and quantitative questions over APP's with at most demonic
non-determinism.Comment: 24 pages, full version to the conference paper on POPL 201
Non-polynomial Worst-Case Analysis of Recursive Programs
We study the problem of developing efficient approaches for proving
worst-case bounds of non-deterministic recursive programs. Ranking functions
are sound and complete for proving termination and worst-case bounds of
nonrecursive programs. First, we apply ranking functions to recursion,
resulting in measure functions. We show that measure functions provide a sound
and complete approach to prove worst-case bounds of non-deterministic recursive
programs. Our second contribution is the synthesis of measure functions in
nonpolynomial forms. We show that non-polynomial measure functions with
logarithm and exponentiation can be synthesized through abstraction of
logarithmic or exponentiation terms, Farkas' Lemma, and Handelman's Theorem
using linear programming. While previous methods obtain worst-case polynomial
bounds, our approach can synthesize bounds of the form
as well as where is not an integer. We present
experimental results to demonstrate that our approach can obtain efficiently
worst-case bounds of classical recursive algorithms such as (i) Merge-Sort, the
divide-and-conquer algorithm for the Closest-Pair problem, where we obtain
worst-case bound, and (ii) Karatsuba's algorithm for
polynomial multiplication and Strassen's algorithm for matrix multiplication,
where we obtain bound such that is not an integer and
close to the best-known bounds for the respective algorithms.Comment: 54 Pages, Full Version to CAV 201
Modeling the scaling properties of human mobility
While the fat tailed jump size and the waiting time distributions
characterizing individual human trajectories strongly suggest the relevance of
the continuous time random walk (CTRW) models of human mobility, no one
seriously believes that human traces are truly random. Given the importance of
human mobility, from epidemic modeling to traffic prediction and urban
planning, we need quantitative models that can account for the statistical
characteristics of individual human trajectories. Here we use empirical data on
human mobility, captured by mobile phone traces, to show that the predictions
of the CTRW models are in systematic conflict with the empirical results. We
introduce two principles that govern human trajectories, allowing us to build a
statistically self-consistent microscopic model for individual human mobility.
The model not only accounts for the empirically observed scaling laws but also
allows us to analytically predict most of the pertinent scaling exponents
Complexity Theory for Discrete Black-Box Optimization Heuristics
A predominant topic in the theory of evolutionary algorithms and, more
generally, theory of randomized black-box optimization techniques is running
time analysis. Running time analysis aims at understanding the performance of a
given heuristic on a given problem by bounding the number of function
evaluations that are needed by the heuristic to identify a solution of a
desired quality. As in general algorithms theory, this running time perspective
is most useful when it is complemented by a meaningful complexity theory that
studies the limits of algorithmic solutions.
In the context of discrete black-box optimization, several black-box
complexity models have been developed to analyze the best possible performance
that a black-box optimization algorithm can achieve on a given problem. The
models differ in the classes of algorithms to which these lower bounds apply.
This way, black-box complexity contributes to a better understanding of how
certain algorithmic choices (such as the amount of memory used by a heuristic,
its selective pressure, or properties of the strategies that it uses to create
new solution candidates) influences performance.
In this chapter we review the different black-box complexity models that have
been proposed in the literature, survey the bounds that have been obtained for
these models, and discuss how the interplay of running time analysis and
black-box complexity can inspire new algorithmic solutions to well-researched
problems in evolutionary computation. We also discuss in this chapter several
interesting open questions for future work.Comment: This survey article is to appear (in a slightly modified form) in the
book "Theory of Randomized Search Heuristics in Discrete Search Spaces",
which will be published by Springer in 2018. The book is edited by Benjamin
Doerr and Frank Neumann. Missing numbers of pointers to other chapters of
this book will be added as soon as possibl
- …