Effective summarisation for search engines

Users of information retrieval (IR) systems issue queries to find information in large collections of documents. Nearly all IR systems return answers in the form of a list of results, where each entry typically consists of the title of the underlying document, a link, and a short query-biased summary of a document's content called a snippet. As retrieval systems typically return a mixture of relevant and non-relevant answers, the role of the snippet is to guide users to identify those documents that are likely to be good answers and to ignore those that are less useful. This thesis focuses on techniques to improve the generation and evaluation of query-biased summaries for informational requests, where users typically need to inspect several documents to fulfil their information needs. We investigate the following issues: how users construct query-biased summaries, and how this compares with current automatic summarisation methods; how query expansion can be applied to sentence-level ranking to improve the quality of query-biased summaries; and, how to evaluate these summarisation approaches using sentence-level relevance data. First, through an eye tracking study, we investigate the way in which users select information from documents when they are asked to construct a query-biased summary in response to a given search request. Our analysis indicates that user behaviour differs from the assumptions of current state-of-the-art query-biased summarisation approaches. A major cause of difference resulted from vocabulary mismatch, a common IR problem. This thesis then examines query expansion techniques to improve the selection of candidate relevant sentences, and to reduce the vocabulary mismatch observed in the previous study. We employ a Cranfield-based methodology to quantitatively assess sentence ranking methods based on sentence-level relevance assessments available in the TREC Novelty track, in line with previous work. We study two aspects of sentence-level evaluation of this track. First, whether sentences that have been judged based on relevance, as in the TREC Novelty track, can also be considered to be indicative; that is, useful in terms of being part of a query-biased summary and guiding users to make correct document selections. By conducting a crowdsourcing experiment, we find that relevance and indicativeness agree around 73% of the time. Second, during our evaluations we discovered a bias that longer sentences were more likely to be judged as relevant. We then propose a novel evaluation of sentence ranking methods, which aims to isolate the sentence length bias. Using our enhanced evaluation method, we find that query expansion can effectively assist in the selection of short sentences. We conclude our investigation with a second study to examine the effectiveness of query expansion in query-biased summarisation methods to end users. Our results indicate that participants significantly tend to prefer query-biased summaries aided through expansion techniques approximately 60% of the time, for query-biased summaries comprised of short and middle length sentences. We suggest that our findings can inform the generation and display of query-biased summaries of IR systems such as search engines