Building Wavelet Histograms on Large Data in MapReduce

MapReduce is becoming the de facto framework for storing and processing massive data, due to its excellent scalability, reliability, and elasticity. In many MapReduce applications, obtaining a compact accurate summary of data is essential. Among various data summarization tools, histograms have proven to be particularly important and useful for summarizing data, and the wavelet histogram is one of the most widely used histograms. In this paper, we investigate the problem of building wavelet histograms efficiently on large datasets in MapReduce. We measure the efficiency of the algorithms by both end-to-end running time and communication cost. We demonstrate straightforward adaptations of existing exact and approximate methods for building wavelet histograms to MapReduce clusters are highly inefficient. To that end, we design new algorithms for computing exact and approximate wavelet histograms and discuss their implementation in MapReduce. We illustrate our techniques in Hadoop, and compare to baseline solutions with extensive experiments performed in a heterogeneous Hadoop cluster of 16 nodes, using large real and synthetic datasets, up to hundreds of gigabytes. The results suggest significant (often orders of magnitude) performance improvement achieved by our new algorithms.Comment: VLDB201

Compressive Mining: Fast and Optimal Data Mining in the Compressed Domain

Real-world data typically contain repeated and periodic patterns. This suggests that they can be effectively represented and compressed using only a few coefficients of an appropriate basis (e.g., Fourier, Wavelets, etc.). However, distance estimation when the data are represented using different sets of coefficients is still a largely unexplored area. This work studies the optimization problems related to obtaining the \emph{tightest} lower/upper bound on Euclidean distances when each data object is potentially compressed using a different set of orthonormal coefficients. Our technique leads to tighter distance estimates, which translates into more accurate search, learning and mining operations \textit{directly} in the compressed domain. We formulate the problem of estimating lower/upper distance bounds as an optimization problem. We establish the properties of optimal solutions, and leverage the theoretical analysis to develop a fast algorithm to obtain an \emph{exact} solution to the problem. The suggested solution provides the tightest estimation of the $L_2$-norm or the correlation. We show that typical data-analysis operations, such as k-NN search or k-Means clustering, can operate more accurately using the proposed compression and distance reconstruction technique. We compare it with many other prevalent compression and reconstruction techniques, including random projections and PCA-based techniques. We highlight a surprising result, namely that when the data are highly sparse in some basis, our technique may even outperform PCA-based compression. The contributions of this work are generic as our methodology is applicable to any sequential or high-dimensional data as well as to any orthogonal data transformation used for the underlying data compression scheme.Comment: 25 pages, 20 figures, accepted in VLD

Plant image retrieval using color, shape and texture features

We present a content-based image retrieval system for plant image retrieval, intended especially for the house plant identification problem. A plant image consists of a collection of overlapping leaves and possibly flowers, which makes the problem challenging.We studied the suitability of various well-known color, shape and texture features for this problem, as well as introducing some new texture matching techniques and shape features. Feature extraction is applied after segmenting the plant region from the background using the max-flow min-cut technique. Results on a database of 380 plant images belonging to 78 different types of plants show promise of the proposed new techniques and the overall system: in 55% of the queries, the correct plant image is retrieved among the top-15 results. Furthermore, the accuracy goes up to 73% when a 132-image subset of well-segmented plant images are considered