4 research outputs found

    Approximability of average completion time scheduling on unrelated machines

    Get PDF
    We show that minimizing the average job completion time on unrelated machines is APX-hard if preemption of jobs is allowed. This provides one of the last missing pieces in the complexity classification of machine scheduling with (weighted) sum of completion times objective. The proof is based on a mixed integer linear program. This means that verification of the reduction is partly done by an ILP-solver. This gives a concise proof which is easy to verify. In addition, we give a deterministic 1.698-approximation algorithm for the weighted version of the problem. The improvement is made by modifying and combining known algorithms and by the use of new lower bounds. These results improve on the known NP-hardness and 2-approximability

    Approximability of average completion time scheduling on unrelated machines

    No full text
    We show that minimizing the sum of completion times on unrelated machines is APX-hard if preemption of jobs is allowed. Additionally, we show that randomized rounding of a convex quadratic program gives a non-preemptive schedule for which the sum of weighted completion times is less than 1.81 times the optimal preemptive sum. This factor is 2.78 if release dates are involved. We sketch how the ratios can be reduced further

    Approximability of average completion time scheduling on unrelated machines

    No full text
    We show that minimizing the sum of completion times on unrelated machines is APX-hard if preemption of jobs is allowed. Additionally, we show that randomized rounding of a convex quadratic program gives a non-preemptive schedule for which the sum of weighted completion times is less than 1.81 times the optimal preemptive sum. This factor is 2.78 if release dates are involved. We sketch how the ratios can be reduced further
    corecore