Recommending Relevant Classes for Bug Reports Using Multi-Objective Search

Developers may follow a tedious process to find the cause of a bug based on code reviews and reproducing the abnormal behavior. In this thesis, we propose an automated approach for finding and ranking potential classes with the respect to the probability of containing a bug based on a bug report description. Our approach finds a good balance between minimizing the number of recommended classes and maximizing the relevance of the proposed solution using a multi-objective optimization algorithm. The relevance of the recommended classes (solution) is estimated based on the use of the history of changes and bug-fixing, and the lexical similarity between the bug report description and the API documentation. We evaluated our system on 6 open source Java projects including more than 22,000 bug reports, using the version of the project before fixing the bug of many bug reports. The experimental results show that the search-based approach significantly outperforms three state-of-the-art methods in recommending relevant files for bug reports. In particular, our multi-objective approach is able to successfully locate the true buggy methods within the top 10 recommendations for over 87% of the bug reports.Master of ScienceSoftware Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of Michigan-Dearbornhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136064/1/Recommending Relevant Classes for Bug Reports Using Multi-Objective Search.pdfDescription of Recommending Relevant Classes for Bug Reports Using Multi-Objective Search.pdf : Master of Science Thesi

Discovering Loners and Phantoms in Commit and Issue Data

The interlinking of commit and issue data has become a de-facto standard in software development. Modern issue tracking systems, such as JIRA, automatically interlink commits and issues by the extraction of identifiers (e.g., issue key) from commit messages. However, the conventions for the use of interlinking methodologies vary between software projects. For example, some projects enforce the use of identifiers for every commit while others have less restrictive conventions. In this work, we introduce a model called PaLiMod to enable the analysis of interlinking characteristics in commit and issue data. We surveyed 15 Apache projects to investigate differences and commonalities between linked and non-linked commits and issues. Based on the gathered information, we created a set of heuristics to interlink the residual of non-linked commits and issues. We present the characteristics of Loners and Phantoms in commit and issue data. The results of our evaluation indicate that the proposed PaLiMod model and heuristics enable an automatic interlinking and can indeed reduce the residual of non-linked commits and issues in software projects

Fuzzy set and cache-based approach for bug triaging

Software bugs are inevitable and bug fixing is an essential and costly phase during software development. Such defects are often reported in bug reports which are stored in an issue tracking system, or bug repository. Such reports need to be assigned to the most appropriate developers who will eventually fix the issue/bug reported. This process is often called Bug Triaging. Manual bug triaging is a difficult, expensive, and lengthy process, since it needs the bug triager to manually read, analyze, and assign bug fixers for each newly reported bug. Triagers can become overwhelmed by the number of reports added to the repository. Time and efforts spent into triaging typically diverts valuable resources away from the improvement of the product to the managing of the development process. To assist triagers and improve the bug triaging efficiency and reduce its cost, this thesis proposes Bugzie, a novel approach for automatic bug triaging based on fuzzy set and cachebased modeling of the bug-fixing capability of developers. Our evaluation results on seven large-scale subject systems show that Bugzie achieves significantly higher levels of efficiency and correctness than existing state-of-the-art approaches. In these subject projects, Bugzie\u27s accuracy for top-1 and top-5 recommendations is higher than those of the second best approach from 4-15% and 6-31%, respectively as Bugzie\u27s top-1 and top-5 recommendation accuracy is generally in the range of 31-51% and 70-83%, respectively. Importantly, existing approaches take from hours to days (even almost a month) to finish training as well as predicting, while in Bugzie, training time is from tens of minutes to an hour