Comparison of Different Methods Making Use of Backup Copies for Fault-Tolerant Scheduling on Embedded Multiprocessor Systems

International audienceAs transistors scale down, systems are more vulnerable to faults. Their reliability consequently becomes the main concern, especially in safety-critical applications such as automotive sector, aeronautics or nuclear plants. Many methods have already been introduced to conceive fault-tolerant systems and therefore improve the reliability. Nevertheless, several of them are not suitable for real-time embedded systems since they incur significant overheads, other methods may be less intrusive but at the cost of being too specific to a dedicated system. The aim of this paper is to analyse a method making use of two task copies when on-line scheduling tasks on multiprocessor systems. This method can guarantee the system reliability without causing too much overhead and requiring any special hardware components. In addition, it remains general and thus applicable to large amount of systems. Last but not least, this paper studies two techniques of processor allocation policies: the exhaustive search and the first found solution search. It is shown that the exhaustive search is not necessary for efficient fault-tolerant scheduling and that the latter search significantly reduces the computation complexity, which is interesting for embedded systems

Comparison of Enhancing Methods for Primary/Backup Approach Meant for Fault Tolerant Scheduling

This report explores algorithms aiming at reducing the algorithm run-time and rejection rate when online scheduling tasks on real-time embedded systems consisting of several processors prone to fault occurrence. The authors introduce a new processor scheduling policy and propose new enhancing methods for the primary/backup approach and analyse their performances. The studied techniques are as follows: (i) the method of restricted scheduling windows within which the primary and backup copies can be scheduled, (ii) the method of limitation on the number of comparisons, accounting for the algorithm run-time, when scheduling a task on a system, and (iii) the method of several scheduling attempts. Last but not least, we inject faults to evaluate the impact on scheduling algorithms. Thorough experiments show that the best proposed method is based on the combination of the limitation on the number of comparisons and two scheduling attempts. When it is compared to the primary/backup approach without this method, the algorithm run-time is reduced by 23% (mean value) and 67% (maximum value) and the rejection rate is decreased by 4%. This improvement in the algorithm run-time is significant, especially for embedded systems dealing with hard real-time tasks. Finally, we found out that the studied algorithm performs well in a harsh environment